Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 11 330290 NNY 16 OZ

375 Fairlawn Ave; 377 Fairlawn Ave; 412 Brookdale Ave; 414 Brookdale Ave; 416 X Brookdale Ave; 1678 Avenue Rd; 1682 Avenue Rd; 1686 Avenue Rd; 1688 Avenue Rd; 1690 Avenue Rd; 1694 Avenue Rd; 1696 Avenue Rd; 1698 Avenue Rd; 1702 Avenue Rd; 1704 Avenue Rd

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 22 December 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 375 Fairlawn Ave; 377 Fairlawn Ave; 412 Brookdale Ave; 414 Brookdale Ave; 416 X Brookdale Ave; 1678 Avenue Rd; 1682 Avenue Rd; 1686 Avenue Rd; 1688 Avenue Rd; 1690 Avenue Rd; 1694 Avenue Rd; 1696 Avenue Rd; 1698 Avenue Rd; 1702 Avenue Rd; 1704 Avenue Rd
Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted: 22 December 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 139 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

This application proposes to demolish all existing buildings on site and amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 7-storey mixed-use building. The total gross floor area would be 16,023 m2 (172,470 ft2) which includes 2,007 m2 (21,603 ft2) of retail space. Proposed are a total of 139 units on floors 2-7 which would include the onsite replacement of 18 residential rental units. There would be 234 parking spaces within 2 below grade parking levels consisting of 65 spaces for visitors/commercial and 169 spaces for residential use. A total of 107 bicycle parking spaces are proposed. Access to the site would be from 2 driveways with one from Brookdale Avenue and the other from Fairlawn Avenue.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Mady Development Corporation · registration SM18120
Zoning application for 1678-1704 Avenue Road, and 412-416 Brookdale Avenue. The application is to permit a 7 storey mixed use condominium development with a rental housing component.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18120: Zoning application for 1678-1704 Avenue Road, and 412-416 Brookdale Avenue. The application is to permit a 7 storey mixed use condominium development with a rental housing component. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 330290 NNY 16 OZ at 1698 Avenue Rd: This application proposes to demolish all existing buildings on site and amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 7-storey mixed-use building. The total gross floor area would be 16,023 m2 (172,470 ft2) which includes 2,007 m2 (21,603 ft2) of retail space. Proposed are a total of 139 units on floors 2-7… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning application for 1678-1704 Avenue Road, and 412-416 Brookdale Avenue. The application is to permit a 7 storey mixed use condominium development with a rental …
Matched fields
address
1678-1704 AVENUE RD
application_address
1678 AVENUE RD

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Empire Communities (1704 Avenue Rd)
SM27693 · 20 February 2019 · “1704 Avenue Rd.”
Mady Development Corporation
SM14360 · 27 April 2010 · “1678 Avenue Road”
Mady Development Corporation
SM14245 · 18 March 2010 · “1678 Avenue Road”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=2
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	33	—	100% (n=2)	0%	12%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	57	—	100% (n=3)	0%	27%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.