Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 11 329885 STE 20 OZ

10 York St; 120 Harbour St; 130 Harbour St

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 22 December 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 6; 2 meetings · 3 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 10 York St; 120 Harbour St; 130 Harbour St
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 22 December 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 783 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Rezoning application to construct a mixed use development at 120 and 130 Harbour Street and 10 York Street. The application is for a residential tower with a 4 storey podium and a proposed tower of approximately 65 storeys or 224 metres including mechanical (originally 75 storeys or 253.4 metres including mechanical penthouse) with a total of 725 dwelling units (originally 783 dwelling units) and retail at grade. There is also 6 levels of below grade parking (originally above grade in Floors 2 to 4 of the podium). The podium is to contain storage, mechanical and indoor and outdoor amenity space.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Delnova Developments Inc. · registration SM18194
120 Harbour Street/10 York Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18194: 120 Harbour Street/10 York Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 329885 STE 20 OZ at 130 Harbour St: Rezoning application to construct a mixed use development at 120 and 130 Harbour Street and 10 York Street. The application is for a residential tower with a 4 storey podium and a proposed tower of approximately 65 storeys or 224 metres including mechanical (originally 75 storeys or 253.4 metres in… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 120 Harbour Street/10 York Street
Matched fields
address
120 HARBOUR ST
application_address
120 HARBOUR ST
Deltera Inc. · registration SM18228
Rezing and Site Plan Approvals for 10 York St.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18228: Rezing and Site Plan Approvals for 10 York St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 329885 STE 20 OZ at 130 Harbour St: Rezoning application to construct a mixed use development at 120 and 130 Harbour Street and 10 York Street. The application is for a residential tower with a 4 storey podium and a proposed tower of approximately 65 storeys or 224 metres including mechanical (originally 75 storeys or 253.4 metres in… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezing and Site Plan Approvals for 10 York St.
Matched fields
address
10 YORK ST
application_address
10 YORK ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 6 communications · 2 meetings · 3 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina4
Adam Vaughan1
Mayor1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	4	2	28 September 2012
Adam Vaughan	Councillor staff	1	0	24 January 2014
Mayor	Member of council	1	0	28 September 2012

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Stikeman Elliott LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	10%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=7)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.