lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 11 328745 STE 22 OZ

87 Davisville Ave; 89 Davisville Ave; 91 Davisville Ave; 93 Davisville Ave; 95 Davisville Ave; 97 Davisville Ave; 99 Davisville Ave; 101 Davisville Ave; 103 Davisville Ave; 105 Davisville Ave; 107 Davisville Ave; 108 Balliol St; 110 Balliol St; 112 Balliol St; 114 Balliol St; 116 Balliol St; 118 Balliol St; 120 Balliol St; 122 Balliol St; 124 Balliol St; 126 Balliol St; 128 Balliol St

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
20 December 2011
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
3
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
23
20 meetings · 11 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
87 Davisville Ave; 89 Davisville Ave; 91 Davisville Ave; 93 Davisville Ave; 95 Davisville Ave; 97 Davisville Ave; 99 Davisville Ave; 101 Davisville Ave; 103 Davisville Ave; 105 Davisville Ave; 107 Davisville Ave; 108 Balliol St; 110 Balliol St; 112 Balliol St; 114 Balliol St; 116 Balliol St; 118 Balliol St; 120 Balliol St; 122 Balliol St; 124 Balliol St; 126 Balliol St; 128 Balliol St
Ward
Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted
20 December 2011
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
33,147 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal for a rezoning for a 30 storey and 14 storey building comprising of a total of 33147m2 of residential gross floor area. Theses 2 buildings (on seperate parcels of land) will consist of 36 bachelor units, 357 single bedrooms and 129 two bedrooms with a total of 297 parking spaces (245 for residential use and 52 for visitors). Address shall be 87-107 Davisville Ave and 108-128 Balliol St.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

3 linked registrations · 23 communications · 20 meetings · 11 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 22 St. Paul's9
  • Councillor Matlow Office3
  • Councillor Josh Matlow2
  • Ward 18 Davenport2
  • Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park1
  • Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina1
  • Ward 21 St. Paul's1
  • Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale1
Data table· 11 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 22 St. Paul'sMember of council9920 March 2013
Councillor Matlow OfficeCouncillor staff3320 March 2013
Councillor Josh MatlowCouncillor staff2218 November 2011
Ward 18 DavenportMember of council2228 March 2013
Ward 14 Parkdale-High ParkMember of council1127 March 2013
Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council1025 March 2013
Ward 21 St. Paul'sMember of council1127 March 2013
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-RosedaleMember of council1127 March 2013
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-RosedaleMember of council1025 March 2013
Ward 30 Toronto-DanforthMember of council1025 March 2013
Ward 32 Beaches-East YorkMember of council112 April 2013

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12

44 lobbied · 60 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,799

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=9
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=9

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied14%
  • Matched, unlobbied10%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12: 44 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied441,925100% (n=9)0%14%0.02
Matched, unlobbied601,799100% (n=9)0%10%0.04
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.