Development application 11 320041 STE 18 OZ

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

• Active 18 Community Organization · registration SM21017

  430-444 Dufferin Street and specifically the siteline at 390 Dufferin Street Ince and an amendment of Zoning By-law No. 438-86 and request to amend the official plan due toa failure of the City of To…

  Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73

  A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.

  Source records

  • Registration SM21017: 430-444 Dufferin Street and specifically the siteline at 390 Dufferin Street Ince and an amendment of Zoning By-law No. 438-86 and request to amend the official plan due toa failure of the City of Toronto to announce a decision on the application (Lobbyist Registry)
  • Development application 11 320041 STE 18 OZ at 440 Dufferin St: Employment Lands Conversion. OPA and REZONING application for 2 new mixed use buildings with common underground parking garage. All buildings have ground and second floor commercial / industrial uses and remaining floors are residential. - 402 residential units - buildings range between 9 and 11 st… (Development Applications)

  Matched text

  • particulars: 430-444 Dufferin Street and specifically the siteline at 390 Dufferin Street Ince and an amendment of Zoning By-law No. 438-86 and request to a…

  Matched fields

  address

  430-444 DUFFERIN ST

  application_address

  430 DUFFERIN ST

• The SiteLine Group Inc. · registration SM19724

  390-444 Dufferin St. and 41 Alma Avenue

  Evidence High confidence · score 0.90

  A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.

  Source records

  • Registration SM19724: 390-444 Dufferin St. and 41 Alma Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
  • Development application 11 320041 STE 18 OZ at 440 Dufferin St: Employment Lands Conversion. OPA and REZONING application for 2 new mixed use buildings with common underground parking garage. All buildings have ground and second floor commercial / industrial uses and remaining floors are residential. - 402 residential units - buildings range between 9 and 11 st… (Development Applications)

  Matched text

  • particulars: 390-444 Dufferin St. and 41 Alma Avenue

  Matched fields

  address

  390-444 DUFFERIN ST

  application_address

  444 DUFFERIN ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 3 communications · 3 meetings · 1 office contacted

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

• Choice Properties
  SM37431 · 23 February 2026 · “41 Alma Ave”
• Choice Properties
  SM37432 · 23 February 2026 · “41 Alma Ave”
• SiteLine Property Management Inc.
  SM21687 · 20 April 2015 · “440 Dufferin Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.