Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 11 310294 STE 27 SA

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 15 November 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 2 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 66 Isabella St
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 15 November 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 211 units
Related file: 10 268121 STE 27 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

The application to amend the Zoning By-law proposes to permit a 23-storey addition to the east side of the existing 26-storey residential apartment building. The total height of the proposed building addition including the mechanical penthouse is 72.73 metres. The proposed addition steps down to a 4-storey podium along Church Street. It contains 211 dwelling units including 199 residential rental units as well as 12 residential condominium units located on the top two floors. The applicant is proposing to reduce the amount of underground parking from 183 parking spaces to 166 parking spaces to accommodate the new elevator and stair core.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Mohican Holdings Limited · registration SM15624
Meetings in connection with application for zoning bylaw amendment for 66 Isabella Street.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15624: Meetings in connection with application for zoning bylaw amendment for 66 Isabella Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 310294 STE 27 SA at 66 Isabella St: The application to amend the Zoning By-law proposes to permit a 23-storey addition to the east side of the existing 26-storey residential apartment building. The total height of the proposed building addition including the mechanical penthouse is 72.73 metres. The proposed addition steps down to a … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Meetings in connection with application for zoning bylaw amendment for 66 Isabella Street.
Matched fields
address
66 ISABELLA ST
application_address
66 ISABELLA ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale2

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	2	2	30 August 2011

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Quadrangle Architects Limited1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Mohican Holdings Limited
SM15586 · 1 January 2011 · “66 Isabella Street.”
Mohican Holdings Limited
SM15513 · 6 December 2010 · “66 Isabella Street.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13

56 lobbied · 128 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied7%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13: 56 lobbied and 128 matched unlobbied applications in 32 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	56	—	100% (n=5)	0%	7%	0.16
Matched, unlobbied	128	—	100% (n=7)	0%	2%	0.01

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.