Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 11 295873 STE 27 OZ

200 Dundas St E; 241 Jarvis Street; 251 Jarvis St

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 20 October 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 10; 9 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 200 Dundas St E; 241 Jarvis Street; 251 Jarvis St
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 20 October 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 767 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands for a new mixed use building comprised of one tower and a slab 16 storey base building that transitions to fourteen and then 4 storeys along George Street. 767 Residential units are proposed, with 1262.51 square meters of cultural space. 786 bicycle parking spaces are proposed as well as 405 vehicle parking spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Easton's Group · registration SM17725
meeting with officials to discuss Planning staff report on 200 Dundas Street East
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17725: meeting with officials to discuss Planning staff report on 200 Dundas Street East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 295873 STE 27 OZ at 241 Jarvis St: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands for a new mixed use building comprised of one tower and a slab 16 storey base building that transitions to fourteen and then 4 storeys along George Street. 767 Residential units are proposed, with 1262.51 square meters of cultural space.… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: meeting with officials to discuss Planning staff report on 200 Dundas Street East
Matched fields
address
200 DUNDAS ST E
application_address
200 DUNDAS ST E
Easton's Group of Hotels · registration SM17277
Rezoning application for 241 Jarvis Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17277: Rezoning application for 241 Jarvis Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 295873 STE 27 OZ at 241 Jarvis St: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands for a new mixed use building comprised of one tower and a slab 16 storey base building that transitions to fourteen and then 4 storeys along George Street. 767 Residential units are proposed, with 1262.51 square meters of cultural space.… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning application for 241 Jarvis Street
Matched fields
address
241 JARVIS ST
application_address
241 JARVIS ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 10 communications · 9 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale9
Office of Councillor Wont-Tam1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	9	8	13 January 2017
Office of Councillor Wont-Tam	Councillor staff	1	1	27 January 2012

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

PQR Solutions1 registration
Aird & Berlis LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

82 lobbied · 96 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=13
Matched, unlobbied90% n=14

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied16%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 82 lobbied and 96 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	82	—	100% (n=13)	0%	11%	0.15
Matched, unlobbied	96	—	90% (n=14)	10%	16%	0.08

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.