Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 11 295626 STE 28 OZ

1 York St; 88 Harbour St; 90 Harbour Street; 100 Harbour St

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 19 October 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 11; 9 meetings · 3 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1 York St; 88 Harbour St; 90 Harbour Street; 100 Harbour St
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 19 October 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 1,313 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

PROPERTY KNOWN AS BOTH 90 Harbour and 1 York St. Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning application for new mixed use development - proposing 3 buildings (1 office tower and 2 residential buildings). Office tower 40 stories (158 metres). Two residential buildings 223 and 233 metres including mechanical penthouse ( 66 and 70 stories) with a total of 1313 dwelling units for both buildings. Shared parking with office and residential - 4 levels below grade - 735 parking spaces - 1518 bicycle parking spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Menkes Developments Ltd · registration SM17274
90 Harbour Street, Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17274: 90 Harbour Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 295626 STE 28 OZ at 90 Harbour St: PROPERTY KNOWN AS BOTH 90 Harbour and 1 York St. Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning application for new mixed use development - proposing 3 buildings (1 office tower and 2 residential buildings). Office tower 40 stories (158 metres). Two residential buildings 223 and 233 metres including mechanic… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 90 Harbour Street, Toronto
Matched fields
address
90 HARBOUR ST
application_address
90 HARBOUR ST
Menkes · registration SM15507
90 Harbour Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15507: 90 Harbour Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 295626 STE 28 OZ at 90 Harbour St: PROPERTY KNOWN AS BOTH 90 Harbour and 1 York St. Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning application for new mixed use development - proposing 3 buildings (1 office tower and 2 residential buildings). Office tower 40 stories (158 metres). Two residential buildings 223 and 233 metres including mechanic… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 90 Harbour Street
Matched fields
address
90 HARBOUR ST
application_address
90 HARBOUR ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 11 communications · 9 meetings · 3 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale8
Ward 2 Etobicoke North2
Mayor1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	8	6	2 October 2012
Ward 2 Etobicoke North	Member of council	2	2	12 December 2011
Mayor	Member of council	1	1	12 December 2011

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Sherman Brown Dryer Karol1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Menkes Developments Ltd
SM26306 · 9 May 2018 · “1 York Street”
Sun Life Financial
SM24713 · 15 June 2017 · “1 York Street”
Sun Life Financial
SM24066 · 7 March 2017 · “1 York Street”
Torgan Group
SM11679 · 6 May 2008 · “90 Harbour Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	10%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=7)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.