Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 11 209209 STE 32 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 2 June 2011
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 303 Kingston Rd
- Ward
- Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
- Submitted
- 2 June 2011
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 47 units
- Related file
- 11 209219 STE 32 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Site Plan Approval to permit the development of the site for a new 7 storey residential condominium with 47 dwelling units, 5 commercial units and 2 levels below grade parking containing 36 parking spaces. Includes 6 Live Work Units - See 209219 STE 32 OZ for Rezoning application.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Zen Homes · registration SM17589
We are the architects for a proposed development at 303 kingston rd.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17589: We are the architects for a proposed development at 303 kingston rd. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 209209 STE 32 SA at 303 Kingston Rd: Site Plan Approval to permit the development of the site for a new 7 storey residential condominium with 47 dwelling units, 5 commercial units and 2 levels below grade parking containing 36 parking spaces. Includes 6 Live Work Units - See 209219 STE 32 OZ for Rezoning application. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: We are the architects for a proposed development at 303 kingston rd.
Matched fields
- address
- 303 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 303 KINGSTON RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 19
6 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.