lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 11 202261 WET 13 OZ

34-50 Southport Street

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
25 May 2011
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
11
3 meetings · 8 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
34-50 Southport Street
Ward
Ward 4 · Gord Perks
Submitted
25 May 2011
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposal to construct a mixed use building comprised of two towers at 29 storeys and 26 storeys connected by a three storey base, as well as 15 three storey townhouse units.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 11 communications · 3 meetings · 8 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park4
  • Ward 11 York South-Weston1
  • Ward 12 York South-Weston1
  • Ward 2 Etobicoke North1
  • Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre1
  • Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore1
  • Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore1
  • Ward 7 York West1
Data table· 8 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 13 Parkdale-High ParkMember of council433 October 2012
Ward 11 York South-WestonMember of council101 October 2012
Ward 12 York South-WestonMember of council101 October 2012
Ward 2 Etobicoke NorthMember of council101 October 2012
Ward 4 Etobicoke CentreMember of council101 October 2012
Ward 5 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council101 October 2012
Ward 6 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council101 October 2012
Ward 7 York WestMember of council101 October 2012

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4

12 lobbied · 20 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4: 12 lobbied and 20 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied12Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied20Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.