Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 11 184731 STE 22 OZ
281 Avenue Rd; 283 Avenue Rd; 285 Avenue Rd; 287 Avenue Rd; 289 Avenue Rd
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 29 April 2011
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 281 Avenue Rd; 283 Avenue Rd; 285 Avenue Rd; 287 Avenue Rd; 289 Avenue Rd
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 29 April 2011
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 62 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Rezoning application to construct new 9 storey condo - 62 residential units - 3 levels below grade parking -74 parking spaces - 63 bicycle parking spaces - Application is for 281-289 Avenue Rd
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Brandy Lane Homes · registration SM16025
281-289 Avenue Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16025: 281-289 Avenue Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 184731 STE 22 OZ at 281 Avenue Rd: Rezoning application to construct new 9 storey condo - 62 residential units - 3 levels below grade parking -74 parking spaces - 63 bicycle parking spaces - Application is for 281-289 Avenue Rd (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 281-289 Avenue Road
Matched fields
- address
- 281-289 AVENUE RD
- application_address
- 281 AVENUE RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 4 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 22 St. Paul's | Member of council | 4 | 2 | 5 May 2014 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | 1,925 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | 1,799 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.