Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)

Development application 11 179540 NNY 10 SB

Ward 6 · James PasternakDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 20 April 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 2 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Addresses: 175 Goddard St
Ward: Ward 6 · James Pasternak
Submitted: 20 April 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 62 units
Related file: 11 179526 NNY 10 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

The proposal seeks to subdivide the subject site for 8 lots for single detached dwellings, 27 lots for semi-detached dwellings, (for a total of 62 units), a new public through street and a new public cul-de-sac.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

TACC Developments · registration SM16926
To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16926: To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 179540 NNY 10 SB at 175 Goddard St: The proposal seeks to subdivide the subject site for 8 lots for single detached dwellings, 27 lots for semi-detached dwellings, (for a total of 62 units), a new public through street and a new public cul-de-sac. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street.
Matched fields
address
175 GODDARD ST
application_address
175 GODDARD ST
TACC Developments · registration SM16927
To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16927: To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 179540 NNY 10 SB at 175 Goddard St: The proposal seeks to subdivide the subject site for 8 lots for single detached dwellings, 27 lots for semi-detached dwellings, (for a total of 62 units), a new public through street and a new public cul-de-sac. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description about the development proposal at 175 Goddard Street.
Matched fields
address
175 GODDARD ST
application_address
175 GODDARD ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 10 York Centre2

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 10 York Centre	Member of council	2	2	18 August 2011

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Goldberg Group2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Brookstone Developments Limited
SM13066 · 12 May 2009 · “175 Goddard St.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 6

1 lobbied · 1 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 6: 1 lobbied and 1 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	1	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	48	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.