Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 11 166499 STE 32 OZ

1960 Queen St E; 1960A Queen St E; 1962 Queen St E; 1962A Queen St E

Ward 19 · Brad BradfordDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 6 April 2011; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 6; 4 meetings · 6 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1960 Queen St E; 1960A Queen St E; 1962 Queen St E; 1962A Queen St E
Ward: Ward 19 · Brad Bradford
Submitted: 6 April 2011
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 29 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Rezoning application for new 6 storey mixed use building containing retail on ground floor and residential above - 29 residential units - 25 Below grade parking spaces - 2 Visitor Parking at grade - 37 Bicycle parking spaces. See 166506 STE 32 SA for Site Plan approval application.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

1960 Queen Street E. Ltd · registration SM18060
Retained to provide strategic advice for the rezoning application at 1960 and 1962 Queen Street East
Evidence High confidence · score 0.97
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18060: Retained to provide strategic advice for the rezoning application at 1960 and 1962 Queen Street East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 166499 STE 32 OZ at 1960 Queen St E: Rezoning application for new 6 storey mixed use building containing retail on ground floor and residential above - 29 residential units - 25 Below grade parking spaces - 2 Visitor Parking at grade - 37 Bicycle parking spaces. See 166506 STE 32 SA for Site Plan approval application. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Retained to provide strategic advice for the rezoning application at 1960 and 1962 Queen Street East
Matched fields
address
1962 QUEEN ST E
application_address
1962A QUEEN ST E

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 6 communications · 4 meetings · 6 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Councillor McMahon1
Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park1
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale1
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale1
Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth1
Ward 32 Beaches-East York1

Data table· 6 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Councillor McMahon	Councillor staff	1	1	7 May 2012
Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park	Member of council	1	0	7 May 2012
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	1	0	7 May 2012
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	1	1	8 May 2012
Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth	Member of council	1	1	8 May 2012
Ward 32 Beaches-East York	Member of council	1	1	7 May 2012

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Slobodsky Associates1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Reserve Properties Limited
SM17671 · 5 January 2012 · “1960 Queen Street East”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19

7 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 19: 7 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 6 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.