Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 10 227202 NNY 10 OZ
3 Coneflower Cres; 4 Coneflower Cres; 5 Coneflower Cres; 6 Coneflower Cres; 7 Coneflower Cres; 8 Coneflower Cres; 9 Coneflower Cres; 10 Coneflower Cres; 11 Coneflower Cres; 12 Coneflower Cres; 15 Coneflower Cres; 18 Coneflower Cres; 20 Coneflower Cres; 22 Coneflower Cres; 24 Coneflower Cres; 26 Coneflower Cres; 28 Coneflower Cres; 30 Coneflower Cres; 32 Coneflower Cres; 34 Coneflower Cres; 36 Coneflower Cres; 38 Coneflower Cres; 40 Coneflower Cres; 45 Antibes Dr; 46 Coneflower Cres; 48 Coneflower Cres; 49 Antibes Dr; 50 Coneflower Cres; 51 Antibes Dr; 52 Coneflower Cres; 53 Antibes Dr; 54 Coneflower Cres; 55 Antibes Dr; 57 Antibes Dr; 59 Antibes Dr; 61 Antibes Dr; 63 Antibes Dr; 65 Antibes Dr; 67 Antibes Dr; 69 Antibes Dr; 71 Antibes Dr; 75 Antibes Dr
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 23 July 2010
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 3 Coneflower Cres; 4 Coneflower Cres; 5 Coneflower Cres; 6 Coneflower Cres; 7 Coneflower Cres; 8 Coneflower Cres; 9 Coneflower Cres; 10 Coneflower Cres; 11 Coneflower Cres; 12 Coneflower Cres; 15 Coneflower Cres; 18 Coneflower Cres; 20 Coneflower Cres; 22 Coneflower Cres; 24 Coneflower Cres; 26 Coneflower Cres; 28 Coneflower Cres; 30 Coneflower Cres; 32 Coneflower Cres; 34 Coneflower Cres; 36 Coneflower Cres; 38 Coneflower Cres; 40 Coneflower Cres; 45 Antibes Dr; 46 Coneflower Cres; 48 Coneflower Cres; 49 Antibes Dr; 50 Coneflower Cres; 51 Antibes Dr; 52 Coneflower Cres; 53 Antibes Dr; 54 Coneflower Cres; 55 Antibes Dr; 57 Antibes Dr; 59 Antibes Dr; 61 Antibes Dr; 63 Antibes Dr; 65 Antibes Dr; 67 Antibes Dr; 69 Antibes Dr; 71 Antibes Dr; 75 Antibes Dr
- Ward
- Ward 6 · James Pasternak
- Submitted
- 23 July 2010
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 197 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Rezoning application to permit the construction of 197 townhouse units on existing vacant land municipally known as 55 Antibes Drive. Application revised to permit 203 townhouses comprised of 41 standard units, 96 stacked units and 66 back-to-back units.By-law 160--2012 in effect.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Menkes Homes Inc. · registration SM14378
55 Antibes Drive
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM14378: 55 Antibes Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 227202 NNY 10 OZ at 55 Antibes Dr: Rezoning application to permit the construction of 197 townhouse units on existing vacant land municipally known as 55 Antibes Drive. Application revised to permit 203 townhouses comprised of 41 standard units, 96 stacked units and 66 back-to-back units.By-law 160--2012 in effect. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 55 Antibes Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 55 ANTIBES DR
- application_address
- 55 ANTIBES DR
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 3 communications · 0 meetings · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 10 York Centre | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 9 January 2012 |
| Mayor | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 12 April 2011 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 6
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.