Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 10 200615 STE 27 OZ

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 18 June 2010; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 2 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 25 Mc Murrich St; 906 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 18 June 2010
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands for the purposes of a hotel and residential development consisting of a 23 storey tower fronting on McMurrich Street (in place of existing surface parking lot) and a 27 storey tower fronting onto Yonge Street partially retaining the historically listed Ridpath's Furniture Store building.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Ridpath · registration SM16015
Proposed Mixed Use REdevelopment 906 Yonge St. Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16015: Proposed Mixed Use REdevelopment 906 Yonge St. Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 200615 STE 27 OZ at 906 Yonge St: Rezoning application to permit the redevelopment of the lands for the purposes of a hotel and residential development consisting of a 23 storey tower fronting on McMurrich Street (in place of existing surface parking lot) and a 27 storey tower fronting onto Yonge Street partially retaining the hist… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed Mixed Use REdevelopment 906 Yonge St. Toronto
Matched fields
address
906 YONGE ST
application_address
906 YONGE ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale2

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	2	2	6 October 2011

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Easton's Group of Hotels
SM35401 · 14 March 2024 · “906 Yonge Street”
Easton's/Gupta Group
SM34805 · 12 September 2023 · “906 Yonge Street”
906 Yonge Street Development Inc.
SM34750 · 24 August 2023 · “906 Yonge Street”
Easton's Group
SM33368 · 10 June 2022 · “906 Yonge Street”
Easton's Group
SM32089 · 22 July 2021 · “906 Yonge St”
Easton's Group
SM32058 · 19 July 2021 · “906 Yonge Street”
1293446 Ontario Inc.
SM32019 · 9 July 2021 · “906 Yonge Street”
Easton's Group
SM31954 · 30 June 2021 · “906 Yonge Street”
MTCC #562 and MTCC #698
SM19658 · 9 September 2013 · “906 Yonge Street”
One-Ten Yorkville Limited
SM14168 · 22 February 2010 · “906 Yonge Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11

69 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=9
Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied11%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11: 69 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 31 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	69	—	100% (n=9)	0%	10%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	60	—	100% (n=4)	0%	11%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.