Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 10 174838 ESC 44 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 13 May 2010
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 875 Morningside Ave
- Ward
- Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
- Submitted
- 13 May 2010
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
REVISED SUBMISSION: University of Toronto - City of Toronto Aquatic Centre (Pan Am Games). This will be a shared facility between the University and City, and will be the Aquatic Centre for the Pam Am and Para-Pan Games taking place in the summer of 2015. The building is to be situated in part on the U of T's Scarborough Campus lands and in part on City of Toronto lands, the total site area is approximately 6.7 ha. This jointly owned facility will be approximately 37,000 m2 in size will include two 50 m swimming pools and dive tank, athletic facilities including a gymnasium, indoor track, a fitness centre and other minor athletic facilities. It will also include ancillary offices as well as facilities for the Canadian Sports Institute of Ontario (CSIO). The proposed building height ranges between 30 and 35 m.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 25
3 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.