Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 10 174712 STE 20 OZ

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 13 May 2010; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 156 St George St
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 13 May 2010
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Rezoning application to permti the re-development of the site for a new five storey building generally in place of the existing building of which foundations and basement level would remain.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Wellspring Cultural Foundation · registration SM14181
Redevelopment of 156 St. George Street, Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM14181: Redevelopment of 156 St. George Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 174712 STE 20 OZ at 156 St George St: Rezoning application to permti the re-development of the site for a new five storey building generally in place of the existing building of which foundations and basement level would remain. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 156 St. George Street, Toronto
Matched fields
address
156 ST GEORGE ST
application_address
156 ST GEORGE ST
Wellspring Cultural Foundation · registration SM14182
Redevelopment of 156 St. George Street, Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM14182: Redevelopment of 156 St. George Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 174712 STE 20 OZ at 156 St George St: Rezoning application to permti the re-development of the site for a new five storey building generally in place of the existing building of which foundations and basement level would remain. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 156 St. George Street, Toronto
Matched fields
address
156 ST GEORGE ST
application_address
156 ST GEORGE ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Dentons Canada LLP1 registration
Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11

69 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=9
Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied10%
Matched, unlobbied11%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11: 69 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 31 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	69	—	100% (n=9)	0%	10%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	60	—	100% (n=4)	0%	11%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.