Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 10 155082 ESC 44 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 19 April 2010
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 1625 Military Trl
- Ward
- Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
- Submitted
- 19 April 2010
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 10 155068 ESC 44 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
The site is 10,325 sq.m. in size and is located on the south side of Military Trail between Kingston Road to the east and Old Kingston Road to the west . The property is located within the core area of the Highland Creek Village. An Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control application have been submitted for a 4-storey, 160 unit retirement home. The gross floor area of the proposed building is 13, 111 square metres. A total of 66 at grade parking spaces are proposed. The Official Plan Amendment application is required to amend Site and Area Specific Policy 293 to allow for the development of the retirement home and to reduce the righe-of-way of Military Trail from 27 metres to 23 metres. The Zoning By-law Amendment seeks to rezone the property from Multiple-Family Residential (M) in the Highland Creek Community Zoning By-law No. 10827 to Apartment Residential Zone (A).
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Highland Trail Limited PartnershipSM32243 · 25 August 2021 · “1625 Military Trail”
- Altree Developments Inc.SM27129 · 10 December 2018 · “1625 Military Trail”
- Urban Design & Development Inc.SM23400 · 29 July 2016 · “1625 Military trail”
- Urban Design & Development Inc.SM23360 · 20 July 2016 · “1625 Military Trail”
- Mark V Develpments Inc.SM12719 · 3 February 2009 · “1625 military trail”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 25
4 lobbied · 18 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.