Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 10 147083 STE 28 OZ
7 Queens Quay E; 25 Queens Quay E; 25R Queens Quay E
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 7 April 2010
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 7 Queens Quay E; 25 Queens Quay E; 25R Queens Quay E
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 7 April 2010
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 614 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
OPA and Rezoning application for 3 new mixed use building containing retail at grade / residential above and resident and public parking. - 3 buildings - 2 buildings at 13 stories and 1 building at 35 stories. - 614 units - 773 parking spaces - 4 levels below grade parking -
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Pier 27 Toronto (North) Inc. · registration SM14099
Site Plan, Zoning By-law and Official Plan amendment applications for new mixed use condominium buildings (Phase 2). Ongoing site plan application for Phase 1. Former address is 25 Queens Quay East, …
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM14099: Site Plan, Zoning By-law and Official Plan amendment applications for new mixed use condominium buildings (Phase 2). Ongoing site plan application for Phase 1. Former address is 25 Queens Quay East, now numbered as 15, 29 and 29 Queens Quay East. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 10 147083 STE 28 OZ at 25 R Queens Quay E: OPA and Rezoning application for 3 new mixed use building containing retail at grade / residential above and resident and public parking. - 3 buildings - 2 buildings at 13 stories and 1 building at 35 stories. - 614 units - 773 parking spaces - 4 levels below grade parking - (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …cations for new mixed use condominium buildings (Phase 2). Ongoing site plan application for Phase 1. Former address is 25 Queens Quay East, now numbered as 15, 29 and 29 Queens Quay East.
Matched fields
- address
- 25 QUEENS QUAY E
- application_address
- 25R QUEENS QUAY E
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 15 communications · 10 meetings · 4 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam McConnell | Councillor staff | 6 | 4 | 6 January 2012 |
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 5 | 4 | 15 June 2011 |
| Office of Councillor McConnell, Ward 28 | Councillor staff | 3 | 1 | 12 April 2011 |
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 4 April 2011 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Pier 27 Toronto (North) Inc.SM16109 · 31 March 2011 · “25 Queens Quay East”
- Cityzen Development CorporationSM10790 · 13 February 2008 · “25 queens quay east”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.