lobbyTO

Development application · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)

Development application 10 133285 NNY 23 PL

2 Basswood Rd; 4 Basswood Rd; 6 Basswood Road; 61 Churchill Ave; 65 Churchill Ave; 69 Churchill Ave; 71 Churchill Ave

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
16 March 2010
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
0
0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
Addresses
2 Basswood Rd; 4 Basswood Rd; 6 Basswood Road; 61 Churchill Ave; 65 Churchill Ave; 69 Churchill Ave; 71 Churchill Ave
Ward
Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted
16 March 2010
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Related file
10 133514 NNY 23 CD

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Application to create 30, 3-storey residential townhouses, common element roadway and parkette. Concurrent common element condominium application.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), Ward 18

1 lobbied · 5 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide

2 lobbied · 6 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), Ward 18: 1 lobbied and 5 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied5Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide: 2 lobbied and 6 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied2Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied6Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.