Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 09 200486 NNY 15 OZ
- Status
- Council Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 30 December 2009
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 50 Neptune Dr; 52 Neptune Dr
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Submitted
- 30 December 2009
- Status
- Council Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 169 units; 14,252 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Revised application to permit the development of an 11 storey (35m) condominium building and rental replacement for a total of 169 residential units and 14,252.2 m2 of Gross Floor Area. Also proposed is 265.1m2 of indoor amenity space, 420.6 m2 of outdoor amenity space, 153 residential parking spaces, 23 visitor spaces and 132 bicycle spaces.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2145072 Ontario Incl · registration SM17584
50 and 52 Neptune Drive -- Rezoning Application
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17584: 50 and 52 Neptune Drive -- Rezoning Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 200486 NNY 15 OZ at 52 Neptune Dr: Revised application to permit the development of an 11 storey (35m) condominium building and rental replacement for a total of 169 residential units and 14,252.2 m2 of Gross Floor Area. Also proposed is 265.1m2 of indoor amenity space, 420.6 m2 of outdoor amenity space, 153 residential parking spac… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 50 and 52 Neptune Drive -- Rezoning Application
Matched fields
- address
- 52 NEPTUNE DR
- application_address
- 52 NEPTUNE DR
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 19 December 2011 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8
33 lobbied · 57 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 33 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 12% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 57 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 26% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.