Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 09 191779 STE 20 SA
457 Adelaide St W; 560 King St W; 570 King St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 26 November 2009
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 457 Adelaide St W; 560 King St W; 570 King St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 26 November 2009
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 334 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
New 12 storey multiple use building w/ 4 below grade parking garages, 334 units. Included in the proposal is comercial parking garage component. Property also includes 457 Adelaide St. West. NOTE - also see previous ppr - 09 156386.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Freed Corp. · registration SM12614
560-572 King Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12614: 560-572 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 191779 STE 20 SA at 560 King St W: New 12 storey multiple use building w/ 4 below grade parking garages, 334 units. Included in the proposal is comercial parking garage component. Property also includes 457 Adelaide St. West. NOTE - also see previous ppr - 09 156386. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 560-572 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 560-572 KING ST W
- application_address
- 560 KING ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.