Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 09 167102 NNY 26 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 9 September 2009
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 85 Laird Dr; 115 Laird Dr
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Submitted
- 9 September 2009
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 10,847 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 09 167098 NNY 26 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Application to construct a retail/office complex with a gross floor area of approximately 10,847 square metres. The proposal comprises 9 free-standing buildings ranging in size from 2,000 square metres up to 4,760 square metres (inc. mezzanine) within an existing (designated) heritage building at the east end of the site. The heritage building would be converted to a food store use. The proposal includes 452 surface parking spaces.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
First Capital Holdings Trust · registration SM15389
Development approval application for zoning by-law amendment and site plan for 85 Laird Drive
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM15389: Development approval application for zoning by-law amendment and site plan for 85 Laird Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 167102 NNY 26 SA at 85 Laird Dr: Application to construct a retail/office complex with a gross floor area of approximately 10,847 square metres. The proposal comprises 9 free-standing buildings ranging in size from 2,000 square metres up to 4,760 square metres (inc. mezzanine) within an existing (designated) heritage building at t… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development approval application for zoning by-law amendment and site plan for 85 Laird Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 85 LAIRD DR
- application_address
- 85 LAIRD DR
The Foss Group · registration SM11457
Failure of staff to expedite the application regarding 85 Laird Drive
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11457: Failure of staff to expedite the application regarding 85 Laird Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 167102 NNY 26 SA at 85 Laird Dr: Application to construct a retail/office complex with a gross floor area of approximately 10,847 square metres. The proposal comprises 9 free-standing buildings ranging in size from 2,000 square metres up to 4,760 square metres (inc. mezzanine) within an existing (designated) heritage building at t… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Failure of staff to expedite the application regarding 85 Laird Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 85 LAIRD DR
- application_address
- 85 LAIRD DR
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 7 communications · 3 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 26 Don Valley West | Member of council | 7 | 3 | 1 November 2012 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15
12 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.