Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 09 158112 STE 21 SA

1A Lyndhurst Crt; 1B Lyndhurst Crt; 1C Lyndhurst Crt; 7 Austin Terrace; 7A Austin Ter; 7B Austin Ter; 7C Austin Ter

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 14 August 2009; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 1A Lyndhurst Crt; 1B Lyndhurst Crt; 1C Lyndhurst Crt; 7 Austin Terrace; 7A Austin Ter; 7B Austin Ter; 7C Austin Ter
Ward: Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted: 14 August 2009
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Site Plan Approval for a THREE ROW HOUSES WITHIN A RETAINED PORTION OF THE HERITAGE BUILDING (WITH A REAR ADDITION), ONE PAIR OF SEMI-DETACHED DWELLINGS. PARKING FOR THESE UNITS TO BE PROVIDED UNDERGROUND, WITH ACCESS OFF OF AUSTIN TERRACE. ALSO PROPOSED IS ONE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING, WITH VEHICLE ACCESS OFF OF LYNDHURST COURT.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Renaissance · registration SM16018
7 Austin Terrace
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM16018: 7 Austin Terrace (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 158112 STE 21 SA at 7 Austin Ter: Site Plan Approval for a THREE ROW HOUSES WITHIN A RETAINED PORTION OF THE HERITAGE BUILDING (WITH A REAR ADDITION), ONE PAIR OF SEMI-DETACHED DWELLINGS. PARKING FOR THESE UNITS TO BE PROVIDED UNDERGROUND, WITH ACCESS OFF OF AUSTIN TERRACE. ALSO PROPOSED IS ONE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLING, WITH… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 7 Austin Terrace
Matched fields
address
7 AUSTIN TER
application_address
7 AUSTIN TER

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore	Member of council	1	1	4 March 2011

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Sherman Brown Dryer Karol1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

The Camrost Corporation
SM12690 · 26 January 2009 · “7 Austin Terrace”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

32 lobbied · 72 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12: 32 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	32	—	100% (n=4)	0%	3%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	72	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.05

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.