Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 09 115302 STE 22 OZ
17 Glebe Road West; 23 Glebe Rd W; 1994 Yonge St; 2000 Yonge St; 2008 Yonge St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 9 March 2009
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 17 Glebe Road West; 23 Glebe Rd W; 1994 Yonge St; 2000 Yonge St; 2008 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 9 March 2009
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 196 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Proposed is a 10 storey mixed-use building with 196 residential units with retail at-grade. A total of 158 parking spaces including 16 visitor spaces will be provided for in 3 levels of below-grade parking.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Greenpark Group of Companies · registration SM12689
1994 - 2008 Yonge Street and 17 Glebe Road West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM12689: 1994 - 2008 Yonge Street and 17 Glebe Road West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 115302 STE 22 OZ at 17 Glebe Rd W: Proposed is a 10 storey mixed-use building with 196 residential units with retail at-grade. A total of 158 parking spaces including 16 visitor spaces will be provided for in 3 levels of below-grade parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1994 - 2008 Yonge Street and 17 Glebe Road West
Matched fields
- address
- 1994-2008 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 1994 YONGE ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | 1,925 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | 1,799 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.