lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 09 114473 WET 13 OZ

2 Old Mill Dr; 2490 Bloor St W

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
5 March 2009
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
47
47 meetings · 27 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
2 Old Mill Dr; 2490 Bloor St W
Ward
Ward 4 · Gord Perks
Submitted
5 March 2009
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Proposed amendments to the zoning by-law to permit the development of a mixed-use residential condominium building at the 2490 Bloor Street West site, and a residential condominium building at 2500 Bloor Street West site.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 47 communications · 47 meetings · 27 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore4
  • Ward 11 York South-Weston3
  • Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park3
  • Ward 24 Willowdale3
  • Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth3
  • Ward 37 Scarborough Centre3
  • Ward 9 York Centre3
  • Ward 10 York Centre2
Data table· 27 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 6 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council4427 August 2010
Ward 11 York South-WestonMember of council3327 August 2010
Ward 13 Parkdale-High ParkMember of council3327 August 2010
Ward 24 WillowdaleMember of council3327 August 2010
Ward 29 Toronto-DanforthMember of council3327 August 2010
Ward 37 Scarborough CentreMember of council3327 August 2010
Ward 9 York CentreMember of council3326 August 2010
Ward 10 York CentreMember of council2226 August 2010
Ward 16 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council2226 August 2010
Ward 19 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council2225 August 2010
Ward 5 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council2227 August 2010
Ward 7 York WestMember of council2226 August 2010
Mayor's OfficeCouncillor staff1127 August 2010
Office of Councillor Lindsay Luby Ward 4Councillor staff1127 August 2010
Ward 12 York South-WestonMember of council1125 August 2010
Ward 14 Parkdale-High ParkMember of council1126 August 2010
Ward 17 DavenportMember of council1125 August 2010
Ward 18 DavenportMember of council1125 August 2010
Ward 26 Don Valley WestMember of council1127 August 2010
Ward 3 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1125 August 2010
Ward 33 Don Valley EastMember of council1126 August 2010
Ward 35 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1126 August 2010
Ward 38 Scarborough-CentreMember of council1125 August 2010
Ward 4 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1126 August 2010
Ward 41 Scarborough-Rouge RiverMember of council1126 August 2010
Ward 43 Scarborough EastMember of council1126 August 2010
Ward 8 York WestMember of council1127 August 2010

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4

12 lobbied · 20 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4: 12 lobbied and 20 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied12Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied20Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.