Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 09 110945 NNY 16 OZ

33 Orchard View Blvd; 411 Duplex Ave; 2300 Yonge St

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 20 February 2009; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 33 Orchard View Blvd; 411 Duplex Ave; 2300 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted: 20 February 2009
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Application proposes to add 5 and 7 storey additions above existing office towers and a 3 storey addition extending a base building into the existing open space at grade as well as renovating the interior retail mall, office lobbies and pedestrian connections, to extend a coherent public realm throughout the centre

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

RIOCAN YEC HOLDINGS · registration SM13185
2300 Yonge Street, 411 Duplex AVenue and 33 Orchard View Boulevard Application to permit a three storey retail additon to the existing mall, and 5 and 7 storey addtion to existing office towers
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM13185: 2300 Yonge Street, 411 Duplex AVenue and 33 Orchard View Boulevard Application to permit a three storey retail additon to the existing mall, and 5 and 7 storey addtion to existing office towers (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 09 110945 NNY 16 OZ at 2300 Yonge St: Application proposes to add 5 and 7 storey additions above existing office towers and a 3 storey addition extending a base building into the existing open space at grade as well as renovating the interior retail mall, office lobbies and pedestrian connections, to extend a coherent public realm thro… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2300 Yonge Street, 411 Duplex AVenue and 33 Orchard View Boulevard Application to permit a three storey retail additon to the existing ma…
Matched fields
address
2300 YONGE ST
application_address
2300 YONGE ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Slobodsky Associates1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust
SM36893 · 19 August 2025 · “2300 Yonge Street”
RioCan REIT
SM36188 · 13 December 2024 · “2300 Yonge Street”
RioCan REIT
SM35375 · 5 March 2024 · “2300 Yonge Street”
RC 3180 DUFFERING LP
SM32166 · 6 August 2021 · “2300 Yonge Street”
RIOCAN YEC HOLDINGS
SM19640 · 6 September 2013 · “2300 Yonge Street.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied26%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	33	—	100% (n=3)	0%	12%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	57	—	100% (n=3)	0%	26%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.