Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 08 232254 STE 29 SA
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 30 December 2008
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 2 O'Connor Dr
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Submitted
- 30 December 2008
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 08 232246 STE 29 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Site Plan Approval - redevelopment of property 30 assisted living suites, 35 private hospital beds, 3 guest suites and one chaplin suite, 2 connected buildings on one lot - 21 sub surface and 21 surface parking
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Sisters of St. Joseph for the Diocese of Toronto, in Upper Canada · registration SM14744
2 O'Connor Drive
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM14744: 2 O'Connor Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 232254 STE 29 SA at 2 O'connor Dr: Site Plan Approval - redevelopment of property 30 assisted living suites, 35 private hospital beds, 3 guest suites and one chaplin suite, 2 connected buildings on one lot - 21 sub surface and 21 surface parking (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2 O'Connor Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 2 OCONNOR DR
- application_address
- 2 OCONNOR DR
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Ootes, Ward 29 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 19 July 2010 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Sisters of St. Joseph of TorontoSM18666 · 6 November 2012 · “2 O'Connor Drive”
- Sisters of St. JosephSM12999 · 30 April 2009 · “2 O'Connor Drive”
- Sisters of St. JosephSM12824 · 13 March 2009 · “2 O'Connor Drive”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14
17 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.