Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 08 231178 STE 28 OZ

545 Sherbourne St; 545-565 Sherbourne St; 555 Sherbourne St

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 19 December 2008; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 18; 0 meetings · 18 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 545 Sherbourne St; 545-565 Sherbourne St; 555 Sherbourne St
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 19 December 2008
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 410 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

Rezoning application on the whole of the lands for the redevelopment of existing one storey commercial component with same, additional commercial street frontage development, 410 additional residential rental units including street front townhouse units. Podium over earl street to be demolished.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Medallion Properties · registration SM13184
Rezoning application proposing the redevelopment of the exisitng commercial podium at 545, 555, 565 Sherbourne Street. An addtion of a 38 storey market rental builidng and townhouses
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM13184: Rezoning application proposing the redevelopment of the exisitng commercial podium at 545, 555, 565 Sherbourne Street. An addtion of a 38 storey market rental builidng and townhouses (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 231178 STE 28 OZ at 545 Sherbourne St: Rezoning application on the whole of the lands for the redevelopment of existing one storey commercial component with same, additional commercial street frontage development, 410 additional residential rental units including street front townhouse units. Podium over earl street to be demolished. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning application proposing the redevelopment of the exisitng commercial podium at 545, 555, 565 Sherbourne Street. An addtion of a 38 storey market rental builidng and townhouses
Matched fields
address
565 SHERBOURNE ST
application_address
545-565 SHERBOURNE ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 18 communications · 0 meetings · 18 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 181
Ward 191
Ward 201
Ward 221
Ward 271
Ward 291
Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park1
Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park1

Data table· 18 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Last contact
Ward 18	Councillor staff	1	27 September 2011
Ward 19	Councillor staff	1	27 September 2011
Ward 20	Councillor staff	1	27 September 2011
Ward 22	Councillor staff	1	27 September 2011
Ward 27	Councillor staff	1	27 September 2011
Ward 29	Councillor staff	1	27 September 2011
Ward 13 Parkdale-High Park	Member of council	1	27 September 2011
Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park	Member of council	1	27 September 2011
Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	1	27 September 2011
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	1	27 September 2011
Ward 21 St. Paul's	Member of council	1	27 September 2011
Ward 22 St. Paul's	Member of council	1	27 September 2011
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	1	27 September 2011
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	1	27 September 2011
Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth	Member of council	1	27 September 2011
Ward 30 Toronto-Danforth	Member of council	1	27 September 2011
Ward 31 Beaches-East York	Member of council	1	27 September 2011
Ward 32 Beaches-East York	Member of council	1	27 September 2011

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Slobodsky Associates1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

82 lobbied · 96 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=13
Matched, unlobbied90% n=14

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied16%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 82 lobbied and 96 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	82	—	100% (n=13)	0%	11%	0.15
Matched, unlobbied	96	—	90% (n=14)	10%	16%	0.08

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.