Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 08 213136 STE 27 OZ
5 St Joseph St; 15 St Nicholas St; 606 Yonge St; 608 Yonge St; 618 Yonge St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 15 October 2008
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 5 St Joseph St; 15 St Nicholas St; 606 Yonge St; 608 Yonge St; 618 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 15 October 2008
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 420 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
rezoning application - for mixed use residential commercial development - 420 residential units - retail units
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Diamondcorp · registration SM12396
Processing of Development application for zoning by-law ammendment for 606-618 Yonge St., 5-9 St. Joseph Street, and 11-19, 25 St. Nicholas Street.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM12396: Processing of Development application for zoning by-law ammendment for 606-618 Yonge St., 5-9 St. Joseph Street, and 11-19, 25 St. Nicholas Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 213136 STE 27 OZ at 608 Yonge St: rezoning application - for mixed use residential commercial development - 420 residential units - retail units (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Processing of Development application for zoning by-law ammendment for 606-618 Yonge St., 5-9 St. Joseph Street, and 11-19, 25 St. Nicholas Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 606-618 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 606 YONGE ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.