Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 08 178556 NNY 23 OZ

9 Bogert Ave; 11 Bogert Ave; 15 Bogert Ave; 18 Poyntz Ave; 19 Bogert Ave; 20 Poyntz Ave; 22 Poyntz Ave; 26 Poyntz Ave; 31 Bogert Ave; 36 Poyntz Ave; 49 Bogert Ave; 4726-4728 Yonge St; 4736 Yonge St; 4750 Yonge St

Ward 18 · Lily ChengDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 7 July 2008; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 9 Bogert Ave; 11 Bogert Ave; 15 Bogert Ave; 18 Poyntz Ave; 19 Bogert Ave; 20 Poyntz Ave; 22 Poyntz Ave; 26 Poyntz Ave; 31 Bogert Ave; 36 Poyntz Ave; 49 Bogert Ave; 4726-4728 Yonge St; 4736 Yonge St; 4750 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted: 7 July 2008
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To permit the Emerald Park development of two residential towers, 40 and 30-storeys in height, on a four level base building with commercial uses. The Lansing United Church site is included in the application as the existing church building is to be renovated and expanded to provide additional social facility space and the density incentives from the provision of this space is proposed to be assigned to the Emerald Park development. Remaining density on the church lands is also proposed to be transferred.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Yonge Poyntz Partnership Ltd. · registration SM11593
OPA, Zoning and Site Plan Application for: 4700, 4720, 4750 Yonge Street; 11-21 Bogart Avenue and 19-31 Poyntz Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11593: OPA, Zoning and Site Plan Application for: 4700, 4720, 4750 Yonge Street; 11-21 Bogart Avenue and 19-31 Poyntz Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 178556 NNY 23 OZ at 4736 Yonge St: To permit the Emerald Park development of two residential towers, 40 and 30-storeys in height, on a four level base building with commercial uses. The Lansing United Church site is included in the application as the existing church building is to be renovated and expanded to provide additional soci… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: OPA, Zoning and Site Plan Application for: 4700, 4720, 4750 Yonge Street; 11-21 Bogart Avenue and 19-31 Poyntz Avenue
Matched fields
address
4750 YONGE ST
application_address
4750 YONGE ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Aird & Berlis LLP1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18

38 lobbied · 63 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied15%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18: 38 lobbied and 63 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	38	—	100% (n=7)	0%	21%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	63	—	100% (n=3)	0%	15%	0.04

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.