Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 08 175275 NNY 23 OZ
397B Hillcrest Ave; 399 Hillcrest Ave; 2952 Bayview Ave; 2952A Bayview Ave; 2952B Bayview Ave; 2954 Bayview Ave; 2954A Bayview Ave; 2954B Bayview Ave; 2956 Bayview Ave; 2956A Bayview Ave; 2956B Bayview Ave; 2958 Bayview Ave; 2958A Bayview Ave; 2958B Bayview Ave; 2960A Bayview Ave; 2960B Bayview Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 25 June 2008
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 397B Hillcrest Ave; 399 Hillcrest Ave; 2952 Bayview Ave; 2952A Bayview Ave; 2952B Bayview Ave; 2954 Bayview Ave; 2954A Bayview Ave; 2954B Bayview Ave; 2956 Bayview Ave; 2956A Bayview Ave; 2956B Bayview Ave; 2958 Bayview Ave; 2958A Bayview Ave; 2958B Bayview Ave; 2960A Bayview Ave; 2960B Bayview Ave
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 25 June 2008
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Proposed 11 Townhoused in a R6 zone to be re-zoned into RM1
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Symmetry Developments Inc. · registration SM11397
Proposed townhouse development at 2952-2958 Bayview Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11397: Proposed townhouse development at 2952-2958 Bayview Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 175275 NNY 23 OZ at 2952 Bayview Ave: Proposed 11 Townhoused in a R6 zone to be re-zoned into RM1 (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed townhouse development at 2952-2958 Bayview Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 2952-2958 BAYVIEW AVE
- application_address
- 2952 BAYVIEW AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
37 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 24% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 64% (n=5) | 36% | 16% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.