Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 08 150716 STE 20 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 23 April 2008
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 210 Simcoe St
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 23 April 2008
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 290 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Rezoning application l application to construct new parking 19 - 25 storey mixed residential building containing 290 residential units with 3 levels below grade parking - 95 parking spaces. - 218 bicycle parking spaces
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
First Urban Inc. · registration SM11750
Re-Zoning of 210 Simcoe St.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11750: Re-Zoning of 210 Simcoe St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 150716 STE 20 OZ at 210 Simcoe St: Rezoning application l application to construct new parking 19 - 25 storey mixed residential building containing 290 residential units with 3 levels below grade parking - 95 parking spaces. - 218 bicycle parking spaces (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Re-Zoning of 210 Simcoe St.
Matched fields
- address
- 210 SIMCOE ST
- application_address
- 210 SIMCOE ST
First Urban Inc. · registration SM11599
Planning Application to construct a condominium at 210 Simcoe Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11599: Planning Application to construct a condominium at 210 Simcoe Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 150716 STE 20 OZ at 210 Simcoe St: Rezoning application l application to construct new parking 19 - 25 storey mixed residential building containing 290 residential units with 3 levels below grade parking - 95 parking spaces. - 218 bicycle parking spaces (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning Application to construct a condominium at 210 Simcoe Street
Matched fields
- address
- 210 SIMCOE ST
- application_address
- 210 SIMCOE ST
First Urban Inc. · registration SM11489
Rezoning Application by Development Client, First Urban Inc, for Properties at 40 Wellesley St E and 210 Simcoe Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM11489: Rezoning Application by Development Client, First Urban Inc, for Properties at 40 Wellesley St E and 210 Simcoe Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 08 150716 STE 20 OZ at 210 Simcoe St: Rezoning application l application to construct new parking 19 - 25 storey mixed residential building containing 290 residential units with 3 levels below grade parking - 95 parking spaces. - 218 bicycle parking spaces (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning Application by Development Client, First Urban Inc, for Properties at 40 Wellesley St E and 210 Simcoe Street
Matched fields
- address
- 210 SIMCOE ST
- application_address
- 210 SIMCOE ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
3 linked registrations · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Sorbara Group of CompaniesSM14370 · 30 April 2010 · “210 Simcoe Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.