Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
950 King St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64228, -79.41180
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 9 May 2018 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34538 | Greenwin Inc. | 950 King Street West | Affordable Housing; Building Permits; Planning and Development | 1 June 2023 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
| SM26181 | Palace Arms LP | 950 King Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 8 May 2018 – 17 November 2021 | 1 |
| SM24407 | 2420159 Ontario Inc | 950 King Street West | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study | 25 April 2017 – 31 July 2020 | 0 |
| SM17393 | 4KnowledgeStreams | 950 King Street West. | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study | 2 November 2011 – 1 August 2012 | 0 |
| SM12475 | Tishman Realty Corp | 950 King Street West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 7 November 2008 – 14 April 2015 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 4 March 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0173/26TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 4 August 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 193432 STE 10 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 4 May 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 153602 STE 19 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0173/26TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 4 March 2026 | Closed Approved |
| 21 193432 STE 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 4 August 2021 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 18 153602 STE 19 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 4 May 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
950 King St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 193432 STE 10 SA · submitted 4 August 2021 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM26181 (Palace Arms LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26181: 95, 97, 99 Strachan Avenue & 938, 940, 942, 944 and 950 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 193432 STE 10 SA at 950 King St W: Site Plan Approval for a 18-storey mixed-use building having a residential gross floor area of 14,650 square metres and a non-residential gross floor area of 226 square metres. A total of 229 residential dwelling units are proposed, of which, 40 units are affordable rental units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 95, 97, 99 Strachan Avenue & 938, 940, 942, 944 and 950 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 99 STRACHAN AVE
- application_address
- 99 STRACHAN AVE
950 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 153602 STE 19 OZ · submitted 4 May 2018 · Closed · from registration SM26181 (Palace Arms LP)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM26181: 95, 97, 99 Strachan Avenue & 938, 940, 942, 944 and 950 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 153602 STE 19 OZ at 950 King St W: Zoning By-law to permit a 14-storey mixed use building with an overall height of 49.9 metres (inclusive of mechanical equipment) containing 263 square metres of retail uses and 191 dwelling units. The design proposes to retain the southern and western elevations of the existing Palace Arms building… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 95, 97, 99 Strachan Avenue & 938, 940, 942, 944 and 950 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 99 STRACHAN AVE
- application_address
- 99 STRACHAN AVE
950 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
18 153602 STE 19 OZ · submitted 4 May 2018 · Closed · from registration SM27410 (Intentional Capital)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM27410: ZBA application in support of redevelopment of 938-950 King St. W. & 95-99 Strachan Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 153602 STE 19 OZ at 950 King St W: Zoning By-law to permit a 14-storey mixed use building with an overall height of 49.9 metres (inclusive of mechanical equipment) containing 263 square metres of retail uses and 191 dwelling units. The design proposes to retain the southern and western elevations of the existing Palace Arms building… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: ZBA application in support of redevelopment of 938-950 King St. W. & 95-99 Strachan Ave.
Matched fields
- address
- 938-950 KING ST W
- application_address
- 938 KING ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.