Address · Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie

920 Progress Ave

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 8; 3 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 1; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
Location: 43.78245, -79.23338
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

A1 Development IncSM34193 · 14 February 20238

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Paul Ainslie4
Paul Ainslie3
Mayors Office1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Paul Ainslie	Councillor staff	4	1	23 February 2023
Paul Ainslie	Member of council	3	1	22 February 2023
Mayors Office	Councillor staff	1	0	1 March 2023

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM34193	A1 Development Inc	920 Progress Ave	Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop…	14 February 2023 – 18 August 2025	8

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 11 May 2026Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 26 158478 ESC 24 OZUnder Review · In progress

Data table· 1 row

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
26 158478 ESC 24 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	11 May 2026	Under Review In progress

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

930 Progress Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
26 158478 ESC 24 OZ · submitted 11 May 2026 · Under Review · from registration SM37605 (Holy Trinity Armenian Church)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM37605: Discussion with members of Council regarding proposed redevelopment of 920 and 930 Progress Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 26 158478 ESC 24 OZ at 930 Progress Ave: Redevelopment of the lands consisting of, a 17-storey mixed use building containing apartment dwelling units intended for seniors, and a dedicated daycare/pre-school facility. The development will be phased. A 2-storey community centre/banquet hall, and, two new 39-storey residential buildings.The … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Discussion with members of Council regarding proposed redevelopment of 920 and 930 Progress Avenue.
Matched fields
address
930 PROGRESS AVE
application_address
930 PROGRESS AVE

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 24

8 lobbied · 7 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 24: 8 lobbied and 7 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.