Address
9 Dale Ave
About this address
- Ward
- — (address points for this address fall in more than one ward)
- Location
- 43.75003, -79.21001
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 7 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 11 | Councillor staff | 4 | 2 | 5 December 2018 |
| Ward 11 University-Rosedale | Member of council | 4 | 2 | 5 December 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Layton | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 6 February 2019 |
| Office of Councillor Layton, Ward 19 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 28 November 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 19 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 28 November 2018 |
| Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 28 November 2018 |
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 12 November 2015 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM27102 | Dale Inc. and Dale II Inc | 9 Dale Avenue | Planning and Development, Heritage | 28 November 2018 – 27 November 2020 | 2 |
| SM27111 | My Rosedale Neighbourhood and South Rosedale Residents Association | 9 Dale Avenue | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 27 November 2018 – 27 November 2019 | 7 |
| SM27112 | My Rosedale Neighbourhood and South Rosedale Residents Association | 9 Dale Avenue | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 27 November 2018 – 27 November 2019 | 7 |
| SM22500 | A member of the Great Gulf Group of Companies | 9 Dale Ave. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 12 November 2015 – 31 May 2017 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 26 April 2022Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 22 138572 STE 11 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 8 September 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0206/20SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 8 September 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0207/20SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 8 September 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0035/20SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 September 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 235833 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 5 August 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 202229 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 138572 STE 11 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 26 April 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0206/20SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 8 September 2020 | Closed Approved |
| A0207/20SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 8 September 2020 | Closed Approved |
| B0035/20SC Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 8 September 2020 | Closed Approved |
| 17 235833 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 20 September 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 202229 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 5 August 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
5 Dale Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 235833 STE 27 SA · submitted 20 September 2017 · Closed · from registration SM22500 (A member of the Great Gulf Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22500: 3-4 story apartment building re-development located at 5, 7 & 9 Dale Ave., Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 235833 STE 27 SA at 5 Dale Ave: Site Plan Approval to facilitate construction of 4-storey residential building with 26 dwelling units, 27 bicycle parking spaces, 52 residential vehicle parking spaces and 5 visitor vehicle parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 3-4 story apartment building re-development located at 5, 7 & 9 Dale Ave., Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 7&9 DALE AVE
- application_address
- 7 DALE AVE
5 Dale Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 202229 STE 27 OZ · submitted 5 August 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22500 (A member of the Great Gulf Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22500: 3-4 story apartment building re-development located at 5, 7 & 9 Dale Ave., Toronto. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 202229 STE 27 OZ at 5 Dale Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit a 4-storey residential building with 26 dwelling units, 27 bicycle parking spaces, 52 residential vehicle parking spaces and 5 visitor vehicle parking spaces, and to permit rear ground floor terraces to be constructed within the 10 metre setback … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 3-4 story apartment building re-development located at 5, 7 & 9 Dale Ave., Toronto.
Matched fields
- address
- 7&9 DALE AVE
- application_address
- 7 DALE AVE
5 Dale Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 202229 STE 27 OZ · submitted 5 August 2016 · Closed · from registration SM27102 (Dale Inc. and Dale II Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27102: Development applications of 5,7,9 Dale Avenue, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 202229 STE 27 OZ at 5 Dale Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit a 4-storey residential building with 26 dwelling units, 27 bicycle parking spaces, 52 residential vehicle parking spaces and 5 visitor vehicle parking spaces, and to permit rear ground floor terraces to be constructed within the 10 metre setback … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development applications of 5,7,9 Dale Avenue, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 9 DALE AVE
- application_address
- 9 DALE AVE
5 Dale Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 202229 STE 27 OZ · submitted 5 August 2016 · Closed · from registration SM27111 (My Rosedale Neighbourhood and South Rosedale Residents Association)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27111: Proposed redevelopment of 5, 7 and 9 Dale Avenue and demolition of existing heritage buildings. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 202229 STE 27 OZ at 5 Dale Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit a 4-storey residential building with 26 dwelling units, 27 bicycle parking spaces, 52 residential vehicle parking spaces and 5 visitor vehicle parking spaces, and to permit rear ground floor terraces to be constructed within the 10 metre setback … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed redevelopment of 5, 7 and 9 Dale Avenue and demolition of existing heritage buildings.
Matched fields
- address
- 9 DALE AVE
- application_address
- 9 DALE AVE
5 Dale Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 202229 STE 27 OZ · submitted 5 August 2016 · Closed · from registration SM27112 (My Rosedale Neighbourhood and South Rosedale Residents Association)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27112: Proposed redevelopment of 5, 7 and 9 Dale Avenue and demolition of existing heritage buildings. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 202229 STE 27 OZ at 5 Dale Ave: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit a 4-storey residential building with 26 dwelling units, 27 bicycle parking spaces, 52 residential vehicle parking spaces and 5 visitor vehicle parking spaces, and to permit rear ground floor terraces to be constructed within the 10 metre setback … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed redevelopment of 5, 7 and 9 Dale Avenue and demolition of existing heritage buildings.
Matched fields
- address
- 9 DALE AVE
- application_address
- 9 DALE AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11
4 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 24
3 lobbied · 13 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.