Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik

89-109 Niagara St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 2; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 0
Applications at this address: 4; 3 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Location: 43.64145, -79.40314
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Aspen Ridge HomesSM29988 · 23 April 20200
Aspen Ridge HomesSM27647 · 14 February 20190

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

No communications recorded.

All registrations· 2 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM29988	Aspen Ridge Homes	89-109 Niagara Street	Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian…	23 April 2020 – 23 April 2021	0
SM27647	Aspen Ridge Homes	89-109 Niagara St.	Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development, Heritage; Planning and D…	14 February 2019 – 31 December 2023	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 9 June 2023Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 23 158544 STE 10 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 29 June 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0859/21TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 5 December 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 271399 STE 19 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 2 March 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 130868 STE 19 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 4 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
23 158544 STE 10 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	9 June 2023	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0859/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	29 June 2021	Closed Approved
17 271399 STE 19 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	5 December 2017	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
12 130868 STE 19 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	2 March 2012	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

89-109 Niagara St · Minor variance (MV)
A0859/21TEY · submitted 29 June 2021 · Closed · from registration SM29988 (Aspen Ridge Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29988: 89-109 Niagara Street Matters pertaining to the above noted planning applications. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0859/21TEY at 89-109 Niagara St: To alter the redevelopment plan approved under Site Specific By-law No. 644-2015 by reducing the minimum number of parking spaces required for all residential units. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 89-109 Niagara Street Matters pertaining to the above noted planning applications.
Matched fields
address
89-109 NIAGARA ST
application_address
89-109 NIAGARA ST
89-109 Niagara St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 271399 STE 19 SA · submitted 5 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM27647 (Aspen Ridge Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27647: RE development of 89-109 Niagara St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 271399 STE 19 SA at 89-109 Niagara St: Redevelopment of the property at 89-109 Niagara Street for a new mixed use complex which includes the retention and reuse of the existing heritage buildings (National Casket Factory) and the addition of a new building with two residential towers 12 and 14 storeys in height in the southerly portion … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: RE development of 89-109 Niagara St.
Matched fields
address
89-109 NIAGARA ST
application_address
89-109 NIAGARA ST
89-109 Niagara St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 271399 STE 19 SA · submitted 5 December 2017 · Closed · from registration SM29988 (Aspen Ridge Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29988: 89-109 Niagara Street Matters pertaining to the above noted planning applications. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 271399 STE 19 SA at 89-109 Niagara St: Redevelopment of the property at 89-109 Niagara Street for a new mixed use complex which includes the retention and reuse of the existing heritage buildings (National Casket Factory) and the addition of a new building with two residential towers 12 and 14 storeys in height in the southerly portion … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 89-109 Niagara Street Matters pertaining to the above noted planning applications.
Matched fields
address
89-109 NIAGARA ST
application_address
89-109 NIAGARA ST

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10

4 lobbied · 25 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10: 4 lobbied and 25 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	25	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

20 lobbied · 261 matched

Median days

Lobbied136
Matched, unlobbied138

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=20
Matched, unlobbied93% n=214

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Objection rate

Lobbied14%
Matched, unlobbied18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10: 20 lobbied and 261 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	20	136	100% (n=20)	0%	0%	14%
Matched, unlobbied	261	138	93% (n=214)	7%	5%	18%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,881

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	66	—	100% (n=5)	0%	3%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	165	1,881	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.04

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	88	—	100% (n=7)	0%	11%	0.03
Matched, unlobbied	94	—	100% (n=6)	0%	5%	0.01

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 10

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide