Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
88 Scott St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.64853, -79.37646
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 11 April 2016Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 16 138743 STE 28 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 18 August 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 259298 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 9 May 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 190645 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 138743 STE 28 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 11 April 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 259298 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 18 August 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 190645 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 9 May 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
40 Scott St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
11 259298 STE 28 SA · submitted 18 August 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18452 (Concert Properties Ltd)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18452: Applications for a zoning by-law amendment and site plan approval to permit the redevelopment of the property municipally known as 40 Scott Street and 10 Wellington Street East with a 58-storey mixed-use building. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 259298 STE 28 SA at 40 Scott St: Site plan approval application is to permit a 58-storey residential building comprised of a 5-storey podium and 53-storey tower. The proposed building is 197 metres tall including the mechanical penthouse and contains 523 units. The gross floor area of the building is 50072 square metres which incl… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …s for a zoning by-law amendment and site plan approval to permit the redevelopment of the property municipally known as 40 Scott Street and 10 Wellington Street East with a 58-storey mixed-use building.
Matched fields
- address
- 40 SCOTT ST
- application_address
- 40 SCOTT ST
10 Wellington St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 190645 STE 28 OZ · submitted 9 May 2011 · Closed · from registration SM17570 (Concert Properties Ltd)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17570: Discussion in regards to the Development Proposal for 40 Scott Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 190645 STE 28 OZ at 10 Wellington St E: The purpose of the rezoning application is to permit a 58-storey residential building comprised of a 5-storey podium and 53-storey tower. Revision has been submitted including the following: proposed height was 195 metres now 202 metres tall including the mechanical penthouse; proposed units was 51… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Discussion in regards to the Development Proposal for 40 Scott Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 40 SCOTT ST
- application_address
- 40 SCOTT ST
10 Wellington St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 190645 STE 28 OZ · submitted 9 May 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18452 (Concert Properties Ltd)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18452: Applications for a zoning by-law amendment and site plan approval to permit the redevelopment of the property municipally known as 40 Scott Street and 10 Wellington Street East with a 58-storey mixed-use building. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 190645 STE 28 OZ at 10 Wellington St E: The purpose of the rezoning application is to permit a 58-storey residential building comprised of a 5-storey podium and 53-storey tower. Revision has been submitted including the following: proposed height was 195 metres now 202 metres tall including the mechanical penthouse; proposed units was 51… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …s for a zoning by-law amendment and site plan approval to permit the redevelopment of the property municipally known as 40 Scott Street and 10 Wellington Street East with a 58-storey mixed-use building.
Matched fields
- address
- 40 SCOTT ST
- application_address
- 40 SCOTT ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
83 lobbied · 97 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 83 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 11% | 0.14 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 97 | 1,793 | 93% (n=14) | 7% | 17% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.