Address · Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
87 Ethel Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Location
- 43.66875, -79.47299
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
6These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 9 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 5 York South-Weston | Member of council | 7 | 7 | 21 March 2022 |
| City Manager | City staff | 3 | 3 | 5 October 2020 |
| Mayor | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 18 March 2022 |
| Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 3 | 0 | 28 March 2018 |
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 13 March 2020 |
| Councillor Ann Bailao | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 13 March 2020 |
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 11 April 2018 |
| Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 21 January 2019 |
| Frances Nunziata | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 2 December 2024 |
All registrations· 6 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM36148 | 87 Ethel avenue holdings Inc | 87 Ethel Avenue | Planning and Development; Combined Application | 25 November 2024 – 24 November 2025 | 0 |
| SM30152 | Ikore Developments | 87 Ethel Ave | Planning and Development | 3 June 2020 – 1 July 2024 | 4 |
| SM29674 | Ikore Developments | 87 Ethel Avenue | Planning and Development Application; Official Plan | 23 January 2020 – 31 December 2026 | 5 |
| SM27134 | 87 Ethel avenue holdings Inc | 87 Ethel Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 5 December 2018 – 31 October 2021 | 4 |
| SM26974 | Ikore Developments | 87 Ethel Avenue | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Official P… | 9 November 2018 – 8 November 2020 | 6 |
| SM24187 | Red Eagle Enterprises Inc | 87 Ethel Avenue. | Affordable Housing; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development A… | 11 March 2017 – 9 November 2018 | 4 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 30 June 2025Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 25 186132 WET 05 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 19 October 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0083/18EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 28 December 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 271272 WET 11 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 186132 WET 05 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 June 2025 | Under Review In progress |
| B0083/18EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 19 October 2018 | Closed Approved |
| 16 271272 WET 11 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 28 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
87 Ethel Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
25 186132 WET 05 SA · submitted 30 June 2025 · Under Review · from registration SM29674 (Ikore Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29674: We will be discussing the application as well as pending ZBL and SPA applications for 87 Ethel Avenue with City staff as well as the area Councillors. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 186132 WET 05 SA at 87 Ethel Ave: Proposed redevelopment of the site will be comprised of (i) buildings A and B; and (ii) buildings C and D which will consist of 7,238.8 sq.m/77,919 sq.ft of non-residential uses or 7.14% of the total GFA will provide for offices, retail, services, restaurants, entertainment and other uses including… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: We will be discussing the application as well as pending ZBL and SPA applications for 87 Ethel Avenue with City staff as well as the area Councillors.
Matched fields
- address
- 87 ETHEL AVE
- application_address
- 87 ETHEL AVE
87 Ethel Ave · Consent (severance) (CO)
B0083/18EYK · submitted 19 October 2018 · Closed · from registration SM29674 (Ikore Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29674: We will be discussing the application as well as pending ZBL and SPA applications for 87 Ethel Avenue with City staff as well as the area Councillors. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application B0083/18EYK at 87 Ethel Ave: Section 57(1) of The Planning Act allows the assignment of authority to the Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment or his/her designate to approve a Validation of Title.dcampanella@parenteborean.com (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: We will be discussing the application as well as pending ZBL and SPA applications for 87 Ethel Avenue with City staff as well as the area Councillors.
Matched fields
- address
- 87 ETHEL AVE
- application_address
- 87 ETHEL AVE
87 Ethel Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 271272 WET 11 OZ · submitted 28 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24187 (Red Eagle Enterprises Inc)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24187: Client Red Eagle Enterprise Inc. has submitted a rezoning application to develop 87 Ethel Avenue. Red Eagle is also an appellant with regard to the OMB appeal of OPA 231 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 271272 WET 11 OZ at 87 Ethel Ave: Proposed redevelopment of the site with a combination of mixed-use and residential buildings. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Client Red Eagle Enterprise Inc. has submitted a rezoning application to develop 87 Ethel Avenue. Red Eagle is also an appellant with regard to the OMB appeal of OPA 231
Matched fields
- address
- 87 ETHEL AVE
- application_address
- 87 ETHEL AVE
87 Ethel Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 271272 WET 11 OZ · submitted 28 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM26974 (Ikore Developments)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM26974: I have been retained by iKore Developments Ltd to assist with rezoning and official plan amendment applications with respect to 87 Ethel Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 271272 WET 11 OZ at 87 Ethel Ave: Proposed redevelopment of the site with a combination of mixed-use and residential buildings. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …een retained by iKore Developments Ltd to assist with rezoning and official plan amendment applications with respect to 87 Ethel Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 87 ETHEL AVE
- application_address
- 87 ETHEL AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
- 87 Ethel Avenue and 2595 St. Clair Avenue West - Fee Removal for Lifting of Hold Applications2025.EY25.24 · 17 September 2025
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 5
15 lobbied · 40 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 40 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 5
1 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5
12 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.