Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
82 Peter St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64673, -79.39311
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 2 April 2013 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM17331 | Allied Properties REIT | 82 Peter Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 17 October 2011 – 22 August 2014 | 3 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
1- Submitted 28 March 2012Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 12 144710 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 1 row
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 144710 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 28 March 2012 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
82 Peter St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
12 144710 STE 20 OZ · submitted 28 March 2012 · Closed · from registration SM17331 (Allied Properties REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM17331: Redevelopment of 388 King Street West and 82 Peter Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 12 144710 STE 20 OZ at 82 Peter St: To construct a 33-storey storey office tower with retail uses at grade, containing a total gross floor area of 74736m2 and 256 parking spaces below grade. A building stepback of 22.5 m will be provided above the 11th storey at King Street and an additional 8.95 m above the 21st storey. Servicing an… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 388 King Street West and 82 Peter Street
Matched fields
- address
- 388 KING ST W
- application_address
- 388 KING ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.