Address · Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
800 Gerrard St E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Location
- 43.66733, -79.34472
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 4 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 221377 STE 14 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 December 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 270566 STE 30 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 23 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 270571 STE 30 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 221377 STE 14 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 4 October 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 270566 STE 30 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 270571 STE 30 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
800 Gerrard St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 270566 STE 30 OZ · submitted 23 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM25749 (George Popper Architect)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25749: Proposal to build a 58 unit mixed use building at 794 Gerrard Street east (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270566 STE 30 OZ at 800 Gerrard St E: December 14 revisions. The proposed height of the building has been reduced to 22 metres. Two retail parking spaces have been provided. The proposed loading space has been relocated and the proposed bottle drop off has been removed. The Applicant, George Popper Architect Inc., has submitted a Rezon… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposal to build a 58 unit mixed use building at 794 Gerrard Street east
Matched fields
- address
- 794 GERRARD ST E
- application_address
- 794 GERRARD ST E
800 Gerrard St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 270566 STE 30 OZ · submitted 23 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM25779 (Grid (Logan) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25779: To discuss the proposed development at 794 Gerrard Street East, particularly matters relating to Urban Design, Planning, Transportation Services, Waste, Engineering (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270566 STE 30 OZ at 800 Gerrard St E: December 14 revisions. The proposed height of the building has been reduced to 22 metres. Two retail parking spaces have been provided. The proposed loading space has been relocated and the proposed bottle drop off has been removed. The Applicant, George Popper Architect Inc., has submitted a Rezon… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To discuss the proposed development at 794 Gerrard Street East, particularly matters relating to Urban Design, Planning, Transportation Services, Waste, Engineering
Matched fields
- address
- 794 GERRARD ST E
- application_address
- 794 GERRARD ST E
800 Gerrard St E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 270571 STE 30 SA · submitted 23 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM25749 (George Popper Architect)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25749: Proposal to build a 58 unit mixed use building at 794 Gerrard Street east (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270571 STE 30 SA at 800 Gerrard St E: The Applicant, George Popper Architect Inc., has submitted a Rezoning Application (#16 210566 STE 30 OZ) and Site Plan Application (#16 270571 STE 30 SA) that proposes to develop the subject lands at 794 Gerrard Street East with a 6-storey, mixed-use building that measures 24.06 metres in height an… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposal to build a 58 unit mixed use building at 794 Gerrard Street east
Matched fields
- address
- 794 GERRARD ST E
- application_address
- 794 GERRARD ST E
800 Gerrard St E · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 270571 STE 30 SA · submitted 23 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM25779 (Grid (Logan) Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25779: To discuss the proposed development at 794 Gerrard Street East, particularly matters relating to Urban Design, Planning, Transportation Services, Waste, Engineering (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270571 STE 30 SA at 800 Gerrard St E: The Applicant, George Popper Architect Inc., has submitted a Rezoning Application (#16 210566 STE 30 OZ) and Site Plan Application (#16 270571 STE 30 SA) that proposes to develop the subject lands at 794 Gerrard Street East with a 6-storey, mixed-use building that measures 24.06 metres in height an… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To discuss the proposed development at 794 Gerrard Street East, particularly matters relating to Urban Design, Planning, Transportation Services, Waste, Engineering
Matched fields
- address
- 794 GERRARD ST E
- application_address
- 794 GERRARD ST E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 14
18 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14
17 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.