Address · Ward 3 · Amber Morley
8 Newcastle St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Location
- 43.61863, -79.49495
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 8 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Morley | Councillor staff | 59 | 17 | 22 May 2026 |
| Development Review | City staff | 23 | 6 | 4 September 2026 |
| Amber Morley | Member of council | 6 | 1 | 26 January 2026 |
| Toronto Building | City staff | 4 | 0 | 9 January 2025 |
| Housing Secretariat | City staff | 3 | 1 | 13 November 2025 |
| Parks & Recreation | City staff | 3 | 0 | 12 May 2026 |
| City Planning | City staff | 1 | 0 | 19 August 2025 |
| Development and Growth Services | City staff | 1 | 0 | 26 May 2025 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM35829 | Minto (Mimico) Inc. | 8 Newcastle St | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 7 August 2024 – 31 December 2026 | 88 |
| SM35014 | Minto Communities Inc. | 8 Newcastle Street | Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 13 November 2023 – 31 December 2026 | 12 |
| SM26301 | Freed Grand Park Developments Inc. | 8 Newcastle Street | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 4 June 2018 – 3 June 2019 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 5 July 2024Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 24 175201 WET 03 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 4 July 2024Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 24 174546 WET 03 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 27 July 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0304/23EYKClosed · Approved
- Submitted 17 April 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5255208Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 18 June 2021Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 21 172862 WET 03 SBUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 6 June 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 168925 WET 06 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 175201 WET 03 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 5 July 2024 | Under Review In progress |
| 24 174546 WET 03 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 4 July 2024 | Under Review In progress |
| A0304/23EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 27 July 2023 | Closed Approved |
| COA-5255208 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 17 April 2023 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| 21 172862 WET 03 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 18 June 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 16 168925 WET 06 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 6 June 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
71 Portland St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
24 175201 WET 03 SA · submitted 5 July 2024 · Under Review · from registration SM35829 (Minto (Mimico) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35829: 1-10 Audley St, 8 Newcastle St and 29-71 Portland St (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 175201 WET 03 SA at 71 Portland St: Proposed mixed-use building containing 1,058 units, 23-storey and 27-storey towers atop a nine-storey base building. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1-10 Audley St, 8 Newcastle St and 29-71 Portland St
Matched fields
- address
- 1-10 AUDLEY ST
- application_address
- 10 AUDLEY ST
8 Newcastle St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
24 174546 WET 03 SA · submitted 4 July 2024 · Under Review · from registration SM35724 (Minto (Mimico) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35724: 10 Audley Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 174546 WET 03 SA at 8 Newcastle St: Proposed 40-storey, 123 metre, mixed-use building containing 413 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 10 Audley Street
Matched fields
- address
- 10 AUDLEY ST
- application_address
- 10 AUDLEY ST
8 Newcastle St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
24 174546 WET 03 SA · submitted 4 July 2024 · Under Review · from registration SM35829 (Minto (Mimico) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35829: 1-10 Audley St, 8 Newcastle St and 29-71 Portland St (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 174546 WET 03 SA at 8 Newcastle St: Proposed 40-storey, 123 metre, mixed-use building containing 413 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1-10 Audley St, 8 Newcastle St and 29-71 Portland St
Matched fields
- address
- 1-10 AUDLEY ST
- application_address
- 10 AUDLEY ST
8 Newcastle St · Minor variance (MV)
A0304/23EYK · submitted 27 July 2023 · Closed · from registration SM35829 (Minto (Mimico) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35829: 1-10 Audley St, 8 Newcastle St and 29-71 Portland St (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0304/23EYK at 8 Newcastle St: To consturct a 42-storey mixed use building, located on top of a 5-storey podium. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1-10 Audley St, 8 Newcastle St and 29-71 Portland St
- particulars: 1-10 Audley St, 8 Newcastle St and 29-71 Portland St
Matched fields
- address
- 8 NEWCASTLE ST
- application_address
- 8 NEWCASTLE ST
71 Portland St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 168925 WET 06 OZ · submitted 6 June 2016 · Closed · from registration SM26301 (Freed Grand Park Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26301: Proposal for official plan and zoning by-law amendments to redevelop the properties at: (a) 1 Audley Street; and, (b) 2 and 10 Audley Street, 29, 31, 59 and 71 Portland Street and 8 Newcastle Street, with high rise mixed-use buildings. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 168925 WET 06 OZ at 71 Portland St: This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws to permit a phased multi-block mixed use development consisting of five residential apartment buildings having a total of 123,653 m2 of gross floor area, of which 952 m2 would be for non-residential uses. The proposed buildings… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposal for official plan and zoning by-law amendments to redevelop the properties at: (a) 1 Audley Street; and, (b) 2 and 10 Audley Street, 29, 31, 59 and 71 Portland Street and 8 Newcastle Street, with high rise mixed-use bu…
- particulars: …osal for official plan and zoning by-law amendments to redevelop the properties at: (a) 1 Audley Street; and, (b) 2 and 10 Audley Street, 29, 31, 59 and 71 Portland Street and 8 Newcastle Street, with high rise mixed-use buildings.
Matched fields
- address
- 10 AUDLEY ST
- application_address
- 10 AUDLEY ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | — | 71% (n=10) | 29% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 3
4 lobbied · 265 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 265 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 3
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 16% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.