Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
77 Union St
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.67505, -79.46557
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33214 | H&R REIT | 77 Union St. | Planning and Development; Planning and Development, Combined Application | 6 May 2022 – 31 December 2022 | 0 |
| SM32762 | Primaris REIT | 77 Union St | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan;… | 4 January 2022 – 30 November 2026 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 25 April 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 138162 STE 09 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 7 April 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 131961 STE 09 OZUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 7 April 2022Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 22 131972 STE 09 SBUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 138162 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 25 April 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 22 131961 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 7 April 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 22 131972 STE 09 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 7 April 2022 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
77 Union St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 138162 STE 09 SA · submitted 25 April 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM33214 (H&R REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33214: Matters relating to planning approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands identified as 77 Union St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 138162 STE 09 SA at 77 Union St: Proposal for approximately 135,696 square metres of gross floor area, comprised of approximately 127,228 square metres of residential space, 8,467 square metres of non-residential space. In terms of dwelling units, the proposal will contribute 1,951 units, including a minimum of 10% three-bedroom u… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Matters relating to planning approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands identified as 77 Union St.
Matched fields
- address
- 77 UNION ST
- application_address
- 77 UNION ST
77 Union St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 131961 STE 09 OZ · submitted 7 April 2022 · Under Review · from registration SM33214 (H&R REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33214: Matters relating to planning approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands identified as 77 Union St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 131961 STE 09 OZ at 77 Union St: Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment on the site for a 39-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 8467 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 127,228 square metres. 1951 residential dwelling units are prop… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Matters relating to planning approvals for the proposed redevelopment of the lands identified as 77 Union St.
Matched fields
- address
- 77 UNION ST
- application_address
- 77 UNION ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 9
1 lobbied · 3 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.