Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
77 River St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.65965, -79.35720
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Tory | Councillor staff | 6 | 6 | 17 November 2020 |
| Office of Councillor Wong-Tam, Ward 13 | Councillor staff | 4 | 4 | 8 July 2019 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM36421 | TAS | 77 River St. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 6 March 2025 – 24 August 2026 | 0 |
| SM27456 | TAS | 77 River Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 29 January 2019 – 31 December 2023 | 10 |
| SM20487 | 7LA TAS LP | 77 River Street | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 1 June 2014 – 30 December 2016 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 31 October 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 243731 STE 13 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 17 June 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 175807 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 243731 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 31 October 2019 | Under Review In progress |
| 14 175807 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 17 June 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
7 Labatt Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 175807 STE 28 OZ · submitted 17 June 2014 · Closed · from registration SM18688 (TAS 7LA Corp.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18688: 7 Labatt Avenue -- Applications for Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 175807 STE 28 OZ at 7 Labatt Ave: An Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning application has been submitted for the subject lands to permit the construction of a 38 Storey tower including an 11 storey base building. The proposal would contain 584 residential units. The proposal also includes 1,582 square metres of retail space located… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 7 Labatt Avenue -- Applications for Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment
Matched fields
- address
- 7 LABATT AVE
- application_address
- 7 LABATT AVE
7 Labatt Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 175807 STE 28 OZ · submitted 17 June 2014 · Closed · from registration SM20487 (7LA TAS LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20487: Plan to apply for an Official Plan and Zoning by-law amendment for 77 River Street and 7 Labatt Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 175807 STE 28 OZ at 7 Labatt Ave: An Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning application has been submitted for the subject lands to permit the construction of a 38 Storey tower including an 11 storey base building. The proposal would contain 584 residential units. The proposal also includes 1,582 square metres of retail space located… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Plan to apply for an Official Plan and Zoning by-law amendment for 77 River Street and 7 Labatt Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 77 RIVER ST
- application_address
- 77 RIVER ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.