Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
75 Elderwood Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.69542, -79.42303
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 21 St. Paul's | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 3 February 2017 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM23936 | Toma Valley Homes | 75 Elderwood Dr. | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 19 January 2017 – 19 January 2019 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 23 December 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 270455 STE 21 OZOMB Approved · Approved
- Submitted 23 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 270463 STE 21 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 270455 STE 21 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 23 December 2016 | OMB Approved Approved |
| 16 270463 STE 21 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1677 Bathurst St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 270455 STE 21 OZ · submitted 23 December 2016 · OMB Approved · from registration SM23936 (Toma Valley Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23936: OPA & ZBA Applications in support of redevelopment of 1675-1679 Bathurst St. & 75 Elderwood Dr. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270455 STE 21 OZ at 1677 Bathurst St: The original proposal for a Zoning By-law Amendment and Official Plan Amendment to permit a 4 storey apartment building consisting of 45 residential units (including 13 are rental replacement units) was approved by the Ontario Land Tribunal on May 30, 2019. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: OPA & ZBA Applications in support of redevelopment of 1675-1679 Bathurst St. & 75 Elderwood Dr.
Matched fields
- address
- 1675-1679 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 1679 BATHURST ST
1677 Bathurst St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 270463 STE 21 SA · submitted 23 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM23936 (Toma Valley Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23936: OPA & ZBA Applications in support of redevelopment of 1675-1679 Bathurst St. & 75 Elderwood Dr. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270463 STE 21 SA at 1677 Bathurst St: Proposal for rezoning and official plan amendment for a 4 storey apartment building consisting of 45 residential units (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: OPA & ZBA Applications in support of redevelopment of 1675-1679 Bathurst St. & 75 Elderwood Dr.
Matched fields
- address
- 1675-1679 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 1679 BATHURST ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.