Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
71 Montclair Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.68733, -79.41374
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 31 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 232445 STE 12 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 May 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 161931 STE 12 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 26 June 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 160786 STE 12 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 232445 STE 12 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 31 October 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 161931 STE 12 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 May 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 20 160786 STE 12 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 26 June 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
63 Montclair Ave · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
21 232445 STE 12 CD · submitted 31 October 2021 · Closed · from registration SM30163 (Montclair Developments LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30163: For a condominium development application located at 63 - 91 Montclair Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 232445 STE 12 CD at 63 Montclair Ave: Draft Plan of Standard Condominium for 421 units, as per a November 19, 2024 Minor Variance application approval. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: For a condominium development application located at 63 - 91 Montclair Ave.
Matched fields
- address
- 63-91 MONTCLAIR AVE
- application_address
- 63 MONTCLAIR AVE
91 Montclair Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 161931 STE 12 SA · submitted 28 May 2021 · Closed · from registration SM30163 (Montclair Developments LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30163: For a condominium development application located at 63 - 91 Montclair Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 161931 STE 12 SA at 91 Montclair Ave: ARevised Site Plan resubmission - Reflects Minor Variance Approval for a residential buidling with a 19 and 21 storey tower that includes a 5-storey podium. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: For a condominium development application located at 63 - 91 Montclair Ave.
Matched fields
- address
- 63-91 MONTCLAIR AVE
- application_address
- 63 MONTCLAIR AVE
63 Montclair Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 160786 STE 12 OZ · submitted 26 June 2020 · Closed · from registration SM30163 (Montclair Developments LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30163: For a condominium development application located at 63 - 91 Montclair Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 160786 STE 12 OZ at 63 Montclair Ave: A proposal to amend the Zoning By-law to allow for a 21 and 23-storey residential building connected by a 5-8 storey podium element with a total of 419 residential units and a gross floor area of approximately 32438 square metres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: For a condominium development application located at 63 - 91 Montclair Ave.
Matched fields
- address
- 63-91 MONTCLAIR AVE
- application_address
- 63 MONTCLAIR AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12
5 lobbied · 11 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.