Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
646 Dufferin St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.65027, -79.43204
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 24 February 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-5586898Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 23 October 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0913/24TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 6 December 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1064/23TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 14 February 2023Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 23 113779 STE 09 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 12 October 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 224777 STE 09 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 7 January 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 101834 STE 09 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| COA-5586898 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 24 February 2025 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| A0913/24TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 October 2024 | Closed Approved |
| A1064/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 6 December 2023 | Closed Approved |
| 23 113779 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 February 2023 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 224777 STE 09 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 12 October 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 19 101834 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 7 January 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
646 Dufferin St · Minor variance (MV)
A0913/24TEY · submitted 23 October 2024 · Closed · from registration SM36055 (Block (Dufferin) Developments Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36055: 646-648 Dufferin Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0913/24TEY at 646 Dufferin St: To alter the development standards (as approved by Site Specific Zoning By-law 950-2021), for an eight-storey apartment building, by increasing the permitted height and the gross floor area, and to reduce a portion of the rear building setbacks and the number of parking spaces on-site. There will b… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 646-648 Dufferin Street
Matched fields
- address
- 646-648 DUFFERIN ST
- application_address
- 646 DUFFERIN ST
646 Dufferin St · Minor variance (MV)
A1064/23TEY · submitted 6 December 2023 · Closed · from registration SM36055 (Block (Dufferin) Developments Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36055: 646-648 Dufferin Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1064/23TEY at 646 Dufferin St: To alter the development standards of the eight-storey residential building (as approved by Site Specific Zoning By-law 950-2021) by reducing a portion of the building setbacks, the first-floor height, and soft landscaping requirements. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 646-648 Dufferin Street
Matched fields
- address
- 646-648 DUFFERIN ST
- application_address
- 646 DUFFERIN ST
646 Dufferin St · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
21 224777 STE 09 CD · submitted 12 October 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM28011 (Block Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28011: Application in support of redevelopment of 646 & 648 Dufferin St. & 1 & 3 Boland Lane (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 224777 STE 09 CD at 646 Dufferin St: *** Draft Plan of Condominium for 124 units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application in support of redevelopment of 646 & 648 Dufferin St. & 1 & 3 Boland Lane
Matched fields
- address
- 646&648 DUFFERIN ST
- application_address
- 646 DUFFERIN ST
646 Dufferin St · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
21 224777 STE 09 CD · submitted 12 October 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM28012 (Block Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28012: Applications in support of redevelopment of 646 & 648 Dufferin St. & 1 & 3 Boland Lane (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 224777 STE 09 CD at 646 Dufferin St: *** Draft Plan of Condominium for 124 units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications in support of redevelopment of 646 & 648 Dufferin St. & 1 & 3 Boland Lane
Matched fields
- address
- 646&648 DUFFERIN ST
- application_address
- 646 DUFFERIN ST
646 Dufferin St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 101834 STE 09 OZ · submitted 7 January 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28011 (Block Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28011: Application in support of redevelopment of 646 & 648 Dufferin St. & 1 & 3 Boland Lane (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 101834 STE 09 OZ at 646 Dufferin St: Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Amendment to permit an 8-storey apartment building fronting onto Dufferin Street and 4 storey townhouses fronting onto Boland Lane. The height of the building would be 25.1 metres (excluding Mechanical Penthouse), and it would contain 78 dwelling units and a total of… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application in support of redevelopment of 646 & 648 Dufferin St. & 1 & 3 Boland Lane
Matched fields
- address
- 646&648 DUFFERIN ST
- application_address
- 646 DUFFERIN ST
646 Dufferin St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 101834 STE 09 OZ · submitted 7 January 2019 · Closed · from registration SM28012 (Block Developments Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM28012: Applications in support of redevelopment of 646 & 648 Dufferin St. & 1 & 3 Boland Lane (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 101834 STE 09 OZ at 646 Dufferin St: Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Amendment to permit an 8-storey apartment building fronting onto Dufferin Street and 4 storey townhouses fronting onto Boland Lane. The height of the building would be 25.1 metres (excluding Mechanical Penthouse), and it would contain 78 dwelling units and a total of… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Applications in support of redevelopment of 646 & 648 Dufferin St. & 1 & 3 Boland Lane
Matched fields
- address
- 646&648 DUFFERIN ST
- application_address
- 646 DUFFERIN ST
646 Dufferin St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 101834 STE 09 OZ · submitted 7 January 2019 · Closed · from registration SM30745 (Block (Dufferin Dundas) Developments Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30745: 646 and 648 Dufferin Street, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 101834 STE 09 OZ at 646 Dufferin St: Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Amendment to permit an 8-storey apartment building fronting onto Dufferin Street and 4 storey townhouses fronting onto Boland Lane. The height of the building would be 25.1 metres (excluding Mechanical Penthouse), and it would contain 78 dwelling units and a total of… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 646 and 648 Dufferin Street, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 648 DUFFERIN ST
- application_address
- 648 DUFFERIN ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9
2 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.