Address · Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
6435 Kingston Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
- Location
- 43.79089, -79.15831
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
24- Submitted 30 August 2018Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 18 217760 ESC 44 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0427/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0428/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0429/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0430/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0431/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0432/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0433/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0434/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0435/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0436/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0437/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0438/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0439/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0440/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0441/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0443/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0444/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0445/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0457/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 13 November 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application COA-4279552Cancelled · Withdrawn
- Submitted 21 July 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0277/17SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 3 April 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 137806 ESC 44 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 3 April 2014Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 14 137816 ESC 44 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 24 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 217760 ESC 44 PL Development application | Part Lot Control Exemption (PL) | 30 August 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0427/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0428/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0429/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0430/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0431/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0432/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0433/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0434/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0435/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0436/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0437/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0438/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0439/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0440/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0441/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0443/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0444/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0445/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| A0457/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Closed Approved |
| COA-4279552 Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 13 November 2017 | Cancelled Withdrawn |
| A0277/17SC Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 21 July 2017 | Closed Approved |
| 14 137806 ESC 44 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 3 April 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 137816 ESC 44 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 3 April 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide
2 lobbied · 6 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 25
1 lobbied · 9 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 25
3 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.