Address · Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
628 Church St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Location
- 43.66959, -79.38284
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Saxe | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 20 June 2023 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34558 | Aspen Ridge Homes | 628 Church Street. | Building Permits | 13 June 2023 – 31 December 2026 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 19 March 2025Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 25 131454 STE 11 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 21 March 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0366/22TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 15 March 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 130026 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 October 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 241973 STE 27 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 September 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 227468 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 131454 STE 11 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 19 March 2025 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0366/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 21 March 2022 | Closed Approved |
| 18 130026 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 15 March 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 241973 STE 27 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 2 October 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 227468 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 24 September 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
628 Church St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 227468 STE 27 OZ · submitted 24 September 2014 · Closed · from registration SM19609 (Aspen Ridge Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19609: Mixed Use Development 628-636 Church Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 227468 STE 27 OZ at 628 Church St: Rezoning application for a mixed use development containing a 49 storey residential apartment building, with retail uses at grade along church street and low rise apartments along Charles Street East. The proposal includes 383 condominium apartments, 20 rental replacement apartment units, and 349 s… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Mixed Use Development 628-636 Church Street
Matched fields
- address
- 628-636 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 628 CHURCH ST
628 Church St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 227468 STE 27 OZ · submitted 24 September 2014 · Closed · from registration SM19622 (Aspen Ridge Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19622: RE the development of 628, 634, and 636 Church St. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 227468 STE 27 OZ at 628 Church St: Rezoning application for a mixed use development containing a 49 storey residential apartment building, with retail uses at grade along church street and low rise apartments along Charles Street East. The proposal includes 383 condominium apartments, 20 rental replacement apartment units, and 349 s… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: RE the development of 628, 634, and 636 Church St.
Matched fields
- address
- 636 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 636 CHURCH ST
628 Church St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
14 227468 STE 27 OZ · submitted 24 September 2014 · Closed · from registration SM19685 (Aspen Ridge Homes)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM19685: Rezoning application for 628, 634-636 Church Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 14 227468 STE 27 OZ at 628 Church St: Rezoning application for a mixed use development containing a 49 storey residential apartment building, with retail uses at grade along church street and low rise apartments along Charles Street East. The proposal includes 383 condominium apartments, 20 rental replacement apartment units, and 349 s… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning application for 628, 634-636 Church Street
Matched fields
- address
- 634-636 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 634 CHURCH ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 11
4 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 11
16 lobbied · 354 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 354 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 11
69 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.