Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
620 Dundas St E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.66193, -79.36232
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
22- Submitted 31 January 2025Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 25 111133 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 13 January 2025Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 25 103941 STE 13 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 22 August 2023Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 23 192194 STE 13 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 22 June 2023Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 23 164931 STE 13 CDDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 23 May 2021Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0690/21TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 17 May 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 155748 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 October 2020Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 20 208683 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 5 June 2020Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0471/20TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 17 May 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 155939 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 8 May 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0480/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 15 February 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 117678 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 268551 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 8 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 261959 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 31 August 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 215421 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 4 March 2013Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 13 127808 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 12 November 2010Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 10 295632 STE 28 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 1 October 2010Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 10 269563 STE 28 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 21 July 2010Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 10 225905 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 March 2009Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 09 119883 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 December 2008Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 08 226483 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 December 2008Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 08 226495 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 24 October 2008Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 08 215642 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 22 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 111133 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 31 January 2025 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 25 103941 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 13 January 2025 | Under Review In progress |
| 23 192194 STE 13 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 August 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 23 164931 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 22 June 2023 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| A0690/21TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 23 May 2021 | Closed Approved |
| 21 155748 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 17 May 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 20 208683 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 20 October 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0471/20TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 5 June 2020 | Closed Approved |
| 19 155939 STE 13 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 17 May 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0480/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 8 May 2018 | Closed Approved |
| 18 117678 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 February 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 268551 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 19 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 261959 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 8 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 215421 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 31 August 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 127808 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 4 March 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 10 295632 STE 28 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 12 November 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 10 269563 STE 28 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 1 October 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 10 225905 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 21 July 2010 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 09 119883 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 25 March 2009 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 226483 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 2 December 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 226495 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 2 December 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 215642 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 24 October 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13
4 lobbied · 23 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 23 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 13
5 lobbied · 76 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 76 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.