Address · Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
5789 Steeles Ave E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 23 · Jamaal Myers
- Location
- 43.83328, -79.26242
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 27 May 2025Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 25 166275 ESC 23 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 September 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 213561 ESC 23 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 21 December 2020Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0055/20SCClosed · Approved
- Submitted 3 May 2016Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0027/16SCClosed · Approved
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 166275 ESC 23 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 27 May 2025 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 24 213561 ESC 23 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 September 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| B0055/20SC Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 21 December 2020 | Closed Approved |
| B0027/16SC Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 3 May 2016 | Closed Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
5789 Steeles Ave E · Consent (severance) (CO)
B0055/20SC · submitted 21 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM27854 (Lesso Mall Development (Toronto) Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27854: Site Plan Application 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East - Section 37 Agreement Consent to Sever application, folder # 20 232643 ESC 23 CO (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application B0055/20SC at 5789 Steeles Ave E: The purpose of this application to: i) sever the land into two blocks for commercial development (Part 1-to be retained (Parts 1-8) and Part 2-to be conveyed (Parts 9-19)); ii) the extension of State Crown Boulevard (Part 20); iii) to create two servicing easements in favour of the City of Toronto.… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Site Plan Application 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East - Section 37 Agreement Consent to Sever application, folder # 20 232643 ESC 23 CO
Matched fields
- address
- 5789-5951 STEELES AVE E
- application_address
- 5789 STEELES AVE E
5789 Steeles Ave E · Consent (severance) (CO)
B0027/16SC · submitted 3 May 2016 · Closed · from registration SM27854 (Lesso Mall Development (Toronto) Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27854: Site Plan Application 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East - Section 37 Agreement Consent to Sever application, folder # 20 232643 ESC 23 CO (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application B0027/16SC at 5789 Steeles Ave E: This application is for consent to sever the land at 5789, 5827, 5883, 5933, 5945, and 5951 Steeles Avenue East into two blocks of land for commercial development and a northerly extension of State Crown Boulevard. The proposed blocks of land are shown on the attached Consent Sketch. The Committee … (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Site Plan Application 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East - Section 37 Agreement Consent to Sever application, folder # 20 232643 ESC 23 CO
Matched fields
- address
- 5789-5951 STEELES AVE E
- application_address
- 5789 STEELES AVE E
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 23
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 23
2 lobbied · 2 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 23
4 lobbied · 13 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.